<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Wrench for Social Engineering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/a-spanner-in-the-works-for-social-engineering.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/a-spanner-in-the-works-for-social-engineering.html</link>
	<description>Science Blog from Freelance Science Writer David Bradley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/a-spanner-in-the-works-for-social-engineering.html/comment-page-1#comment-418819</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 07:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=1643#comment-418819</guid>
		<description>Hi Robert

I don&#039;t think it would be worth the effort. If a phisher is sending out a million messages a day, then one misleading response is not going to impact them much, especially when estimates put positive responses at one in a 1000! Incidentally, there was a guy in the news last week who has collected and catalogued every spam message he ever received and there&#039;s another (well-known guy) who does respond to spam and phish with silly messages. As to risks it depends on what you&#039;re giving away by responding...

I used to make stuff up for telemarketers too, but only to get a laugh out of them. After all they&#039;re usually just people too (not always, but usually) and they&#039;ve got mouths to feed and mortgages to pay, it&#039;s not like they are the fat cats who own the cr*p being sold ;-)

db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it would be worth the effort. If a phisher is sending out a million messages a day, then one misleading response is not going to impact them much, especially when estimates put positive responses at one in a 1000! Incidentally, there was a guy in the news last week who has collected and catalogued every spam message he ever received and there&#8217;s another (well-known guy) who does respond to spam and phish with silly messages. As to risks it depends on what you&#8217;re giving away by responding&#8230;</p>
<p>I used to make stuff up for telemarketers too, but only to get a laugh out of them. After all they&#8217;re usually just people too (not always, but usually) and they&#8217;ve got mouths to feed and mortgages to pay, it&#8217;s not like they are the fat cats who own the cr*p being sold ;-)</p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bowen</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/a-spanner-in-the-works-for-social-engineering.html/comment-page-1#comment-418182</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bowen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 20:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=1643#comment-418182</guid>
		<description>Has anyone researched the possible effects and risks of responding to spammers and phishers with mis- or disinformation? It seems that would divert some of their energy and make it less profitable. I&#039;ll make up stuff for telemarketers ( especially after a glass or two of wine) in the interests of wasting their time, but what about the safety of responding to the online weasels?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone researched the possible effects and risks of responding to spammers and phishers with mis- or disinformation? It seems that would divert some of their energy and make it less profitable. I&#8217;ll make up stuff for telemarketers ( especially after a glass or two of wine) in the interests of wasting their time, but what about the safety of responding to the online weasels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
