<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ambiguous aspirin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ambiguous-aspirin.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ambiguous-aspirin.html</link>
	<description>Science Blog from Freelance Science Writer David Bradley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Vikram Pandit</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ambiguous-aspirin.html/comment-page-1#comment-513991</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Vikram Pandit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ambiguous-aspirin.html#comment-513991</guid>
		<description>Use of medicinal plants with the help of computer is my basic concept. Any medicinal plant in the world is to be registered on internet and we will get the current idea of world medicinal plants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use of medicinal plants with the help of computer is my basic concept. Any medicinal plant in the world is to be registered on internet and we will get the current idea of world medicinal plants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ambiguous-aspirin.html/comment-page-1#comment-71662</link>
		<dc:creator>Srinivasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ambiguous-aspirin.html#comment-71662</guid>
		<description>The level of error is very much elementary for the experience of Zaworotko! Having just 13 non-hydrogen atom in the aspirin molecule and without any disorder – the reported R-factor is too high! The DSC thermal analysis of the Zaworotko’s form II doesn’t show sharp melting point.

	Hence this sort of paper got exactly what is needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The level of error is very much elementary for the experience of Zaworotko! Having just 13 non-hydrogen atom in the aspirin molecule and without any disorder – the reported R-factor is too high! The DSC thermal analysis of the Zaworotko’s form II doesn’t show sharp melting point.</p>
<p>	Hence this sort of paper got exactly what is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bt</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ambiguous-aspirin.html/comment-page-1#comment-55505</link>
		<dc:creator>bt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ambiguous-aspirin.html#comment-55505</guid>
		<description>ref 
Janua 1, 2007, iss 1     pages 27-28</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ref<br />
Janua 1, 2007, iss 1     pages 27-28</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ambiguous-aspirin.html/comment-page-1#comment-55503</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ambiguous-aspirin.html#comment-55503</guid>
		<description>C&amp;EN also reported on this issue, and said that Zaworotko and Peterson were rather taken aback by the stance of Desiraju and his colleagues.

The journal quotes Peterson as saying: &quot;&quot;It was such an attacking sort of paper.&quot;

But isn&#039;t this sort of paper exactly what is needed in science to shake things up and make sure the original results being reported in peer-reviewed journals are robust and can stand up to detailed scrutiny?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&amp;EN also reported on this issue, and said that Zaworotko and Peterson were rather taken aback by the stance of Desiraju and his colleagues.</p>
<p>The journal quotes Peterson as saying: &#8220;&#8221;It was such an attacking sort of paper.&#8221;</p>
<p>But isn&#8217;t this sort of paper exactly what is needed in science to shake things up and make sure the original results being reported in peer-reviewed journals are robust and can stand up to detailed scrutiny?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: www.sciencebase.com @ 2012-02-10 01:53:34 -->
