«  ||  »

Cancer Research Blog Carnival #14

Posted in Science at 1:00 pm by David Bradley

Bookmark and Share

cancer research blog carnivalI don’t know anyone who hasn’t got a cancer story to tell, whether it is personal experience, a relative or friend, or association with their patients or through their research.

Cancer has always been with us, but contrary to the popular image propagated by the mainstream media it is not a simple, nor single disease. In this month’s cancer research blog carnival hosted on the Sciencebase Science Blog, I present a few selected posts from fellow bloggers discussing various aspects of cancer research. Thanks to everyone who submitted a cancer research post.

First up is PalMD on the Denialism blog who explains that cancer is the second leading cause of death, in the US at least, and confirms the ubiquity of the disease as 4% of the population is directly affected (think six degrees of separation type networks to see how almost all of us can have a cancer story to tell). The post provides answers to some of the LAQs (least asked questions) and FAQs (frequently asked questions about cancer. A post from Stephan Grindley augments the cancer 101 with a straightforward commentary on breast cancer prevention and detection.

According to Charles Daney on Science & Reason, recent studies are making it increasingly apparent that cancer is really many different diseases and he explains how this means a new approach to understanding cancer at the molecular level.

More particularly covering cancer research, GrrlScientist offers an interesting take on the genetics of colour and cancer in Behold The Pale Horse and BayBlab discusses a recent publication in the journal Science on the subject of trans splicing and chromosomal translocations as well as the connection between chilis and cancer – preventative or protagonist?

HighlightHealth, meanwhile, discusses the implications of a large-scale, multi-dimensional analysis of the genomic characteristics of glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumour in adults. On Hematopoiesis, we learn how travelling normal and malignant cells decide where to stay and on get linked up to five great talks from the experts.

Cancer vaccines are big news and none more so than the vaccine being offered to young girls to protect them from cervical cancer caused by HPV. Health blogger Grace Filby has posted on why this vaccination campaign is not a good idea given the lack of safety data currently available.

Orna Ross tells us about the good things she has gained from having cancer/ and points out that fighting cancer as if it were a battle is not the only approach to tackling the disease. Actorlicious meanwhile provides a star-studded perspective and how the famous and infamous are standing up to cancer.

A post from the University of Oxford science blog on exploiting the Achilles’ heel of cancer, describes how a new approach will lead to treatments with none of the common side effects of cancer therapy. And, Sally Church on the Pharma Strategy blog asks will Abiraterone impact survival in advanced prostate cancer?, the most common carcinoma in men. She also provides a fascinating insight into treating triple negative breast cancer.

Science Metropolis discusses how public health expert Dave Ozonoff hopes to use mathematics and chaos theory to explain paradoxical cancer frequencies, such as those seen in Cape Cod, where rates are 25% higher than the state average in Massachusetts.

Finally, one from the recent Sciencebase archives entitled (hopefully quite controversially) alcohol causes cancer.

Visit the Cancer Carnival site to read past carnivals, to get information on scheduled posts and to find out how to host your own cancer research blog carnival.

Bookmark and Share

15 Responses to “Cancer Research Blog Carnival #14”

  1. jasmin says:

    untrialled snaked oil, hehehehe.

    i think it is only for hopeles people , …….but the man and woman with cancer is hopeles people i think, like Aids ,no medicine which can kill all metastase,i think include the chemotheraphy, with a lot of side efek. so why not to read it. ?

  2. Who knows Michael? Don’t the industry and the government planners drive each other, just like software authors and computer hardware manufacturers? As to the body “dealing with HPV”…is that strictly true in the long-term?

  3. Hi Everyone,
    I have read Grace Filby’s and agree that it makes sense to examine more fully the claims made by GSK & Merck regarding their ‘wonder’ drugs. From reading about HPV, and hearing some medical expert opinions, it seems that the cancer risk is really quite small, as the body will deal with the virus naturally over a period of time anyway. Was this whole vaccination plan proposed by the drug companies or by government? Some clarity here would be helpful to avoid cynical claims that Big Pharma is just looking for another revenue stream to replace the antibiotic one which is slowly drying up. Seems there is more cash in ‘lifestyle’ drugs than than in prevention!

    I have written a letter to the Eastern Daily Press in Norfolk, which so far has not been replied to. A copy can be found at http://www.deepwide.co.uk/Gardasil.html

    Mike Jozefiak

  4. Jasmin, looks like untrialled snake oil to me.

  5. jasmin says:

    dear Sir/madam

    what is your opnion about this blog, http://bigbulletforcancer.blogspot.com/, he said that there is bullet for metastase of cancer stadium 4 only in 2 weeks, and the cost only 300usd$ very cheap

    regards

    jasmin