<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disastrous Rumours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/disastrous-rumours.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/disastrous-rumours.html</link>
	<description>Science Blog from Freelance Science Writer David Bradley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chris piwuna</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/disastrous-rumours.html/comment-page-1#comment-628827</link>
		<dc:creator>chris piwuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=2160#comment-628827</guid>
		<description>At times of disaster, a measure of the negative rumour is needed to keep you going                      (??performance anxiety) especially when you are in a setting where the flow of correct information is skewed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At times of disaster, a measure of the negative rumour is needed to keep you going                      (??performance anxiety) especially when you are in a setting where the flow of correct information is skewed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/disastrous-rumours.html/comment-page-1#comment-544914</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=2160#comment-544914</guid>
		<description>Wayne, I think you&#039;re right, I cannot imagine how a positive rumour would be synthesised and spread, because there&#039;d still be the all the negative rumours that would bubble to the surface regardless to confuse the the issues. Just look at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/melamine-in-milk.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;melamine in milk scandal&lt;/a&gt; being discussed elsewhere here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne, I think you&#8217;re right, I cannot imagine how a positive rumour would be synthesised and spread, because there&#8217;d still be the all the negative rumours that would bubble to the surface regardless to confuse the the issues. Just look at the <a href="http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/melamine-in-milk.html" rel="nofollow">melamine in milk scandal</a> being discussed elsewhere here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/disastrous-rumours.html/comment-page-1#comment-543572</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=2160#comment-543572</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how they can create positive rumours. If such a thing was possible, we&#039;d have seen them come about quite naturally before now.

When i think of rumours, I liken them to the warning bird call, or shriek of an ape. It&#039;s as if they&#039;re a warning call.

What we&#039;ve done as add words to them, which allows for embellishment, often making them worse.

Making rumours worse still is the subjectivity they&#039;re often loaded with.

One person could say: &quot;Oh man, what a mess! Total chaos down there.&quot; But if you&#039;re a professional, like a soldier in the Royal Engineering Regiment, a person used to make the best of bad situations, chaos to you is probably a total and utter loss to everyone else.

It&#039;s still and interesting idea, though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how they can create positive rumours. If such a thing was possible, we&#8217;d have seen them come about quite naturally before now.</p>
<p>When i think of rumours, I liken them to the warning bird call, or shriek of an ape. It&#8217;s as if they&#8217;re a warning call.</p>
<p>What we&#8217;ve done as add words to them, which allows for embellishment, often making them worse.</p>
<p>Making rumours worse still is the subjectivity they&#8217;re often loaded with.</p>
<p>One person could say: &#8220;Oh man, what a mess! Total chaos down there.&#8221; But if you&#8217;re a professional, like a soldier in the Royal Engineering Regiment, a person used to make the best of bad situations, chaos to you is probably a total and utter loss to everyone else.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still and interesting idea, though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
