<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linked In Questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/linked-in-questions.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/linked-in-questions.html</link>
	<description>Science Blog from Freelance Science Writer David Bradley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/linked-in-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-418831</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 07:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/linked-in-questions.html#comment-418831</guid>
		<description>For several very useful tips on how to get the most out of LinkedIn, check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.labnol.org/internet/tools/linkedin-tips-tricks-tweaks-do-more-linkedin-profile/3158/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Digital Inspiration&lt;/a&gt; site from my good friend Amit Agarwal.

db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For several very useful tips on how to get the most out of LinkedIn, check out the <a href="http://www.labnol.org/internet/tools/linkedin-tips-tricks-tweaks-do-more-linkedin-profile/3158/" rel="nofollow">Digital Inspiration</a> site from my good friend Amit Agarwal.</p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/linked-in-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-355949</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/linked-in-questions.html#comment-355949</guid>
		<description>John, thanks for your thoughts and the additional questions. I do plan to actually use the responses from LinkedIn in a subsequent post that I am still working on. I also posted a second related question that also got a lot of interesting, but less defensive answers, that I also intend to work up into a Sciencebase post. So, do make sure you&#039;re subscribed to the newsfeed so you don&#039;t miss those ;-)

db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, thanks for your thoughts and the additional questions. I do plan to actually use the responses from LinkedIn in a subsequent post that I am still working on. I also posted a second related question that also got a lot of interesting, but less defensive answers, that I also intend to work up into a Sciencebase post. So, do make sure you&#8217;re subscribed to the newsfeed so you don&#8217;t miss those ;-)</p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john theibault</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/linked-in-questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-355751</link>
		<dc:creator>john theibault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/linked-in-questions.html#comment-355751</guid>
		<description>David,

That was an interesting experiment. I guess it is encouraging that so many people rose to &quot;defend&quot; the accomplishments of science when they thought you might be an anti-science agitator, even though it didn&#039;t address your specific reasons for posing the question. (Or did you also receive a lot of &quot;people don&#039;t trust science because scientists are all biased&quot; responses?)

Since you are a science journalist, you might have some thoughts on this: Do you think that one of the sources of mistrust of science is that &quot;journalistic reasoning&quot; (and also &quot;legal reasoning,&quot; which is different still) is just different from &quot;scientific reasoning.&quot; And most people get their science through journalism, not from the scientific method directly.

And tangentially... We&#039;re glad that you have joined the conversation at CHF&#039;s own blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://periodictabloid.chemheritage.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Periodic Tabloid&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>That was an interesting experiment. I guess it is encouraging that so many people rose to &#8220;defend&#8221; the accomplishments of science when they thought you might be an anti-science agitator, even though it didn&#8217;t address your specific reasons for posing the question. (Or did you also receive a lot of &#8220;people don&#8217;t trust science because scientists are all biased&#8221; responses?)</p>
<p>Since you are a science journalist, you might have some thoughts on this: Do you think that one of the sources of mistrust of science is that &#8220;journalistic reasoning&#8221; (and also &#8220;legal reasoning,&#8221; which is different still) is just different from &#8220;scientific reasoning.&#8221; And most people get their science through journalism, not from the scientific method directly.</p>
<p>And tangentially&#8230; We&#8217;re glad that you have joined the conversation at CHF&#8217;s own blog <a href="http://periodictabloid.chemheritage.org/" rel="nofollow">Periodic Tabloid</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
