<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile Phones and Cancer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/mobile-phones-and-cancer.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/mobile-phones-and-cancer.html</link>
	<description>Science Blog from Freelance Science Writer David Bradley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline Richmond</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/mobile-phones-and-cancer.html/comment-page-1#comment-55939</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline Richmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/mobile-phones-and-cancer.html#comment-55939</guid>
		<description>If mobile phones cause brain cancer (as distinct from brain rot in journalists) then the incidence of brain cancer will be higher than otherwise expected in all countries where mobile phone use is common - and it is commonest in Finland, home of Nokia and home of this study.
You&#039;d have to discover the annual incidence of brain cancers over several years, before and after the introduction of mobiles.  The pre-mobiles incidence will show what is called the secular trend. If this alters noticeably after the introductions of mobiles - even several years later - it should show on the graph.

I have yet to hear of brain surgeons complaining about their increased workload and wondering what is the cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If mobile phones cause brain cancer (as distinct from brain rot in journalists) then the incidence of brain cancer will be higher than otherwise expected in all countries where mobile phone use is common &#8211; and it is commonest in Finland, home of Nokia and home of this study.<br />
You&#8217;d have to discover the annual incidence of brain cancers over several years, before and after the introduction of mobiles.  The pre-mobiles incidence will show what is called the secular trend. If this alters noticeably after the introductions of mobiles &#8211; even several years later &#8211; it should show on the graph.</p>
<p>I have yet to hear of brain surgeons complaining about their increased workload and wondering what is the cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/mobile-phones-and-cancer.html/comment-page-1#comment-55917</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/mobile-phones-and-cancer.html#comment-55917</guid>
		<description>Enough people use these devices that another data point doesn&#039;t sound like such a bad idea.

Mitch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enough people use these devices that another data point doesn&#8217;t sound like such a bad idea.</p>
<p>Mitch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan mrak</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/mobile-phones-and-cancer.html/comment-page-1#comment-55916</link>
		<dc:creator>stan mrak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/mobile-phones-and-cancer.html#comment-55916</guid>
		<description>This is imperative... there are many studies out there that point to problems, but that information is being supressed by the industry. Beware of any studies that claim that there are no risks; most of them are funded and conrolled by the industry. The recent study from the Danish Cancer Registry is a good example. It&#039;s nothing short of fraudulent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is imperative&#8230; there are many studies out there that point to problems, but that information is being supressed by the industry. Beware of any studies that claim that there are no risks; most of them are funded and conrolled by the industry. The recent study from the Danish Cancer Registry is a good example. It&#8217;s nothing short of fraudulent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: www.sciencebase.com @ 2012-02-10 03:55:51 -->
