PREVIOUSLY: « Social Media for Science Librarians  Rx Reviews Redux »

Dec 17, 2008

Chemistry Dictionary 2.0

Posted in Chemspy at 4:11 pm by David Bradley -- 17 Comments; add your comment

[Post to Twitter]

Earlier this year organic chemist Adam Azman contacted me to ask if there were a free or open source chemistry dictionary available for word processors. Well, a quick search revealed only paid-for dictionaries so he set about creating his own chem dictionary, from scratch. Version 1.0 was hosted on Chemspy and Sciencebase until recently. But, after a lot of hard work on the part of Adam, Tony Williams at Chemspider, and a little bit of nudging and cajoling from yours truly, we now have the new, improved version 2.0

Free Download: Chemistry Dictionary for Word/OpenOffice – version 2.0 available on Sciencebase.com and now Chemspider.com.

You can read more about how Adam’s chemistry dictionary got to where it is on Adam’s chemistry blog.

Keywords: Open Access Chemistry Dictionary, Open Source Chemistry Dictionary, Microsoft Word Chemistry Dictionary, OpenOffice Chemical Dictionary.

Original post 2008-02-08 15:03 updated 2008-12-17 16:11

  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

17 Responses to “Chemistry Dictionary 2.0”

Pages: [2] 1 » Show All

  1. 17
    chemspy Says:
    March 17th, 2008 at 9:08 am

    NLP, it’s a dictionary for spellchecking against, not a definition’s lookup. What do you mean by chemical definitions, you mean synonyms for chemical names – try http://www.chemspider.com – there’s a search box in the sidebar on this site.

    db

  2. 16
    NLP Says:
    March 16th, 2008 at 5:08 pm

    Is your document useful for novices, or only for more advanced people? I didn’t want to download an unknown file without knowing what it’s like, or if it would be of any use to me. Maybe you could show a sample of what one would find if they used your document.
    I’ve just been looking for a list of chemicals & their definitions and having a surprisingly hard time finding one. Thanks,

  3. 15
    ChemSpiderMan Says:
    March 11th, 2008 at 12:30 am

    David…as you know we have now contributed the list of ChemSpider identifiers to Adam to help expand his dictionary. Adam is progressing with his work…a long torturous task now to look for obvious spelling errors if they exist…

  4. 14
    azmanam Says:
    February 12th, 2008 at 7:50 pm

    I’ve created a gmail account for the dictionary. Perhaps this can be used for general questions/comments/suggestions as well as that virtual ‘drop box’ for absorbing other chemists custom dictionaries.

    chemdictionary@gmail.com

  5. 13
    azmanam Says:
    February 12th, 2008 at 6:38 pm

    For a word like analyse, it should be an s

    Ahh… so we’re taking sides now, are we? ;)

    AA- NOT from the UK…

  6. 12
    azmanam Says:
    February 12th, 2008 at 6:32 pm

    I could perhaps try to sift through that and get out the chemical terms if you like, would that be of any use?

    Any improvements to the dictionary will ultimately be of great help – as an incomplete/incorrect dictionary is never the goal. Thank you much for offering.

    a list of named reactions and the top 10000 chemists in the world past and present would probably make a useful addition

    I thought about that, as well as common abbreviations/molecular formulas (e.g. NaOH would be a misspelled word right now). I ultimately left them out, primarily because they are not ‘words’ but either proper names or formulas or abbreviations. What does the community think? Would including names/reactions/formulas be a useful and necessary improvement?

    there’s probably no way to pool that kind of information easily…but I wonder whether there might be some way to assimilate it somehow

    1st, dictionary files are not mutually exclusive. Installing this chemistry dictionary will not override any entries a user may have added-to-dictionary previously. Thus, if by assimilate you meant within one’s own personal computer, there should be no problems.

    2nd, a bit of Microsoft trivia. If a user has previously added words to their dictionary, the added term is not appended to the user’s default English dictionary. Rather, Word creates a “custom” dictionary on your behalf, and conveniently names it CUSTOM.dic. Search your computer (Start Menu–>Search) for ‘custom.dic’ But before you begin the search, click on ‘More Advanced Options’ to make sure ‘Search Hidden Files and Folders’ is checked. That should point you to the location of your custom dictionary file.

    As for pooling the information, here’s what I see. If we had some kind of virtual ‘drop box’ where users could submit a text file (.txt or .dic) with their own personal custom dictionary (preferably with only the chemistry relevant terms in it), those could be easily merged into this dictionary file.

  7. 11
    chemspy Says:
    February 12th, 2008 at 6:10 pm

    I think a list of named reactions and the top 10000 chemists in the world past and present would probably make a useful addition to this project. Adam, what do you think? I know the Merck Index includes a list of named reactions. SJB also hits on the point that countless chemists will have added chemical words to their builtin dictionaries in Word, there’s probably no way to pool that kind of information easily…but I wonder whether there might be some way to assimilate it somehow

    DB (from the UK too)

Pages: [2] 1 » Show All

Leave a Reply