<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chemistry Dictionary 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/open-access-organic-dictionary.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/open-access-organic-dictionary.html</link>
	<description>Science Blog from Freelance Science Writer David Bradley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:41:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/open-access-organic-dictionary.html/comment-page-1#comment-633358</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspy.com/chemistry-news/open-access-organic-dictionary.html#comment-633358</guid>
		<description>many thanks!

there should be a central repository for all of the free, science and medicine related .dic files

dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>many thanks!</p>
<p>there should be a central repository for all of the free, science and medicine related .dic files</p>
<p>dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chemspy</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/open-access-organic-dictionary.html/comment-page-1#comment-381119</link>
		<dc:creator>chemspy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspy.com/chemistry-news/open-access-organic-dictionary.html#comment-381119</guid>
		<description>NLP, it&#039;s a dictionary for spellchecking against, not a definition&#039;s lookup. What do you mean by chemical definitions, you mean synonyms for chemical names - try www.chemspider.com - there&#039;s a search box in the sidebar on this site.

db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NLP, it&#8217;s a dictionary for spellchecking against, not a definition&#8217;s lookup. What do you mean by chemical definitions, you mean synonyms for chemical names &#8211; try <a href="http://www.chemspider.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.chemspider.com</a> &#8211; there&#8217;s a search box in the sidebar on this site.</p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NLP</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/open-access-organic-dictionary.html/comment-page-1#comment-381118</link>
		<dc:creator>NLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspy.com/chemistry-news/open-access-organic-dictionary.html#comment-381118</guid>
		<description>Is your document useful for novices, or only for more advanced people?  I didn&#039;t want to download an unknown file without knowing what it&#039;s like, or if it would be of any use to me.  Maybe you could show a sample of what one would find if they used your document.
I&#039;ve just been looking for a list of chemicals &amp; their definitions and having a surprisingly hard time finding one.  Thanks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is your document useful for novices, or only for more advanced people?  I didn&#8217;t want to download an unknown file without knowing what it&#8217;s like, or if it would be of any use to me.  Maybe you could show a sample of what one would find if they used your document.<br />
I&#8217;ve just been looking for a list of chemicals &amp; their definitions and having a surprisingly hard time finding one.  Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChemSpiderMan</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/open-access-organic-dictionary.html/comment-page-1#comment-381117</link>
		<dc:creator>ChemSpiderMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspy.com/chemistry-news/open-access-organic-dictionary.html#comment-381117</guid>
		<description>David...as you know we have now contributed the list of ChemSpider identifiers to Adam to help expand his dictionary. Adam is progressing with his work...a long torturous task now to look for obvious spelling errors if they exist...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David&#8230;as you know we have now contributed the list of ChemSpider identifiers to Adam to help expand his dictionary. Adam is progressing with his work&#8230;a long torturous task now to look for obvious spelling errors if they exist&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azmanam</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/open-access-organic-dictionary.html/comment-page-1#comment-381116</link>
		<dc:creator>azmanam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspy.com/chemistry-news/open-access-organic-dictionary.html#comment-381116</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve created a gmail account for the dictionary.  Perhaps this can be used for general questions/comments/suggestions as well as that virtual &#039;drop box&#039; for absorbing other chemists custom dictionaries.

chemdictionary@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve created a gmail account for the dictionary.  Perhaps this can be used for general questions/comments/suggestions as well as that virtual &#8216;drop box&#8217; for absorbing other chemists custom dictionaries.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:chemdictionary@gmail.com">chemdictionary@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azmanam</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/open-access-organic-dictionary.html/comment-page-1#comment-381115</link>
		<dc:creator>azmanam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspy.com/chemistry-news/open-access-organic-dictionary.html#comment-381115</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;For a word like analyse, it should be an s&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ahh... so we&#039;re taking sides now, are we?  ;)

AA- NOT from the UK...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>For a word like analyse, it should be an s</p></blockquote>
<p>Ahh&#8230; so we&#8217;re taking sides now, are we?  ;)</p>
<p>AA- NOT from the UK&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azmanam</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/open-access-organic-dictionary.html/comment-page-1#comment-381114</link>
		<dc:creator>azmanam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspy.com/chemistry-news/open-access-organic-dictionary.html#comment-381114</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I could perhaps try to sift through that and get out the chemical terms if you like, would that be of any use?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Any improvements to the dictionary will ultimately be of great help - as an incomplete/incorrect dictionary is never the goal.  Thank you much for offering.

&lt;blockquote&gt;a list of named reactions and the top 10000 chemists in the world past and present would probably make a useful addition&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I thought about that, as well as common abbreviations/molecular formulas (e.g. NaOH would be a misspelled word right now).  I ultimately left them out, primarily because they are not &#039;words&#039; but either proper names or formulas or abbreviations.  What does the community think?  &lt;b&gt;Would including names/reactions/formulas be a useful and necessary improvement?&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;there’s probably no way to pool that kind of information easily…but I wonder whether there might be some way to assimilate it somehow&lt;/blockquote&gt;

1st, dictionary files are not mutually exclusive.  Installing this chemistry dictionary will not override any entries a user may have added-to-dictionary previously.  Thus, if by assimilate you meant within one&#039;s own personal computer, there should be no problems.

2nd, a bit of Microsoft trivia.  If a user has previously added words to their dictionary, the added term is not appended to the user&#039;s default English dictionary.  Rather, Word creates a &quot;custom&quot; dictionary on your behalf, and conveniently names it CUSTOM.dic.  Search your computer (Start Menu--&gt;Search) for &#039;custom.dic&#039;  But before you begin the search, click on &#039;More Advanced Options&#039; to make sure &#039;Search Hidden Files and Folders&#039; is checked.  That should point you to the location of your custom dictionary file.

As for pooling the information, here&#039;s what I see.  If we had some kind of virtual &#039;drop box&#039; where users could submit a text file (.txt or .dic) with their own personal custom dictionary (preferably with only the chemistry relevant terms in it), those could be easily merged into this dictionary file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I could perhaps try to sift through that and get out the chemical terms if you like, would that be of any use?</p></blockquote>
<p>Any improvements to the dictionary will ultimately be of great help &#8211; as an incomplete/incorrect dictionary is never the goal.  Thank you much for offering.</p>
<blockquote><p>a list of named reactions and the top 10000 chemists in the world past and present would probably make a useful addition</p></blockquote>
<p>I thought about that, as well as common abbreviations/molecular formulas (e.g. NaOH would be a misspelled word right now).  I ultimately left them out, primarily because they are not &#8216;words&#8217; but either proper names or formulas or abbreviations.  What does the community think?  <b>Would including names/reactions/formulas be a useful and necessary improvement?</b></p>
<blockquote><p>there’s probably no way to pool that kind of information easily…but I wonder whether there might be some way to assimilate it somehow</p></blockquote>
<p>1st, dictionary files are not mutually exclusive.  Installing this chemistry dictionary will not override any entries a user may have added-to-dictionary previously.  Thus, if by assimilate you meant within one&#8217;s own personal computer, there should be no problems.</p>
<p>2nd, a bit of Microsoft trivia.  If a user has previously added words to their dictionary, the added term is not appended to the user&#8217;s default English dictionary.  Rather, Word creates a &#8220;custom&#8221; dictionary on your behalf, and conveniently names it CUSTOM.dic.  Search your computer (Start Menu&#8211;&gt;Search) for &#8216;custom.dic&#8217;  But before you begin the search, click on &#8216;More Advanced Options&#8217; to make sure &#8216;Search Hidden Files and Folders&#8217; is checked.  That should point you to the location of your custom dictionary file.</p>
<p>As for pooling the information, here&#8217;s what I see.  If we had some kind of virtual &#8216;drop box&#8217; where users could submit a text file (.txt or .dic) with their own personal custom dictionary (preferably with only the chemistry relevant terms in it), those could be easily merged into this dictionary file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chemspy</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/open-access-organic-dictionary.html/comment-page-1#comment-381108</link>
		<dc:creator>chemspy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspy.com/chemistry-news/open-access-organic-dictionary.html#comment-381108</guid>
		<description>I think a list of named reactions and the top 10000 chemists in the world past and present would probably make a useful addition to this project. Adam, what do you think? I know the Merck Index includes a list of named reactions. SJB also hits on the point that countless chemists will have added chemical words to their builtin dictionaries in Word, there&#039;s probably no way to pool that kind of information easily...but I wonder whether there might be some way to assimilate it somehow

DB (from the UK too)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a list of named reactions and the top 10000 chemists in the world past and present would probably make a useful addition to this project. Adam, what do you think? I know the Merck Index includes a list of named reactions. SJB also hits on the point that countless chemists will have added chemical words to their builtin dictionaries in Word, there&#8217;s probably no way to pool that kind of information easily&#8230;but I wonder whether there might be some way to assimilate it somehow</p>
<p>DB (from the UK too)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJB</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/open-access-organic-dictionary.html/comment-page-1#comment-381110</link>
		<dc:creator>SJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspy.com/chemistry-news/open-access-organic-dictionary.html#comment-381110</guid>
		<description>Ok, I understand now.

For what it&#039;s worth, I don&#039;t have a dedicated chemical dictionary for my electronic wordprocessing, and many of the words that I have added as a result of dissertation writing and the like are merely names of authors (unless I needed further use, like mentioning Suzuki-Miyaura couplings every now and then). I could perhaps try to sift through that and get out the chemical terms if you like, would that be of any use?

S (from the UK)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I understand now.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I don&#8217;t have a dedicated chemical dictionary for my electronic wordprocessing, and many of the words that I have added as a result of dissertation writing and the like are merely names of authors (unless I needed further use, like mentioning Suzuki-Miyaura couplings every now and then). I could perhaps try to sift through that and get out the chemical terms if you like, would that be of any use?</p>
<p>S (from the UK)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azmanam</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/open-access-organic-dictionary.html/comment-page-1#comment-381109</link>
		<dc:creator>azmanam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspy.com/chemistry-news/open-access-organic-dictionary.html#comment-381109</guid>
		<description>The chemistry.dic file can be opened with NotePad and the entire list can be viewed.  It can also be edited within NotePad if there are glaring errors or obvious omission.  Save when you close and your dictionary will be updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chemistry.dic file can be opened with NotePad and the entire list can be viewed.  It can also be edited within NotePad if there are glaring errors or obvious omission.  Save when you close and your dictionary will be updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.287 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-08 08:06:29 -->
