<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science and Business Meetingplace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/science-and-business-meetingplace.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/science-and-business-meetingplace.html</link>
	<description>Science Blog from Freelance Science Writer David Bradley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:51:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CMC guy</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/science-and-business-meetingplace.html/comment-page-1#comment-389805</link>
		<dc:creator>CMC guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=1605#comment-389805</guid>
		<description>In line with some statements above I think Science and Business can be connected through Marketing and Engineering (although as chemist I bite my tongue on both counts):  Marketing can identify, guide and establish areas of business demand where Science can contribute.  Engineering can carry out the (often difficult) translation from bench/theory to practical/commercial to enable technology.

Echo of Gerald Lo the classical academic training of scientists, most especially PhDs, tends to be predominately academic research focus will little attention to real world applications. Seems colleagues from Europe have had greater exposure to industry but still in US and EU most schools generate people suited more for academics than where most jobs are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In line with some statements above I think Science and Business can be connected through Marketing and Engineering (although as chemist I bite my tongue on both counts):  Marketing can identify, guide and establish areas of business demand where Science can contribute.  Engineering can carry out the (often difficult) translation from bench/theory to practical/commercial to enable technology.</p>
<p>Echo of Gerald Lo the classical academic training of scientists, most especially PhDs, tends to be predominately academic research focus will little attention to real world applications. Seems colleagues from Europe have had greater exposure to industry but still in US and EU most schools generate people suited more for academics than where most jobs are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Curry</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/science-and-business-meetingplace.html/comment-page-1#comment-389397</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Curry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=1605#comment-389397</guid>
		<description>Via email

To some extent it depends on your concept of &quot;Science&quot;. Science is often considered a body of knowledge. Carl Sagan worked to correct this mis-understanding.

Science is an approach to knowledge, not a body of knowledge. Science, often referred to as the &quot;Scientific Method&quot; is an approach to any and all things. It uses logic/ reasoning skills and valid empirical data. As such where would science NOT meet with business? Perhaps only with failed businesses? Those that are based on emotion with no methodology?

Any and all business segments benefit from a structure review of them. Establishing benchmarks, reviewing successes and failures, reducing error and waste, .... All of this is the application of a scientific approach.

Do you want an successful business venture? There is no better way to assure that than to use a scientific approach.

But then again the same thing can be said about every aspect of your lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via email</p>
<p>To some extent it depends on your concept of &#8220;Science&#8221;. Science is often considered a body of knowledge. Carl Sagan worked to correct this mis-understanding.</p>
<p>Science is an approach to knowledge, not a body of knowledge. Science, often referred to as the &#8220;Scientific Method&#8221; is an approach to any and all things. It uses logic/ reasoning skills and valid empirical data. As such where would science NOT meet with business? Perhaps only with failed businesses? Those that are based on emotion with no methodology?</p>
<p>Any and all business segments benefit from a structure review of them. Establishing benchmarks, reviewing successes and failures, reducing error and waste, &#8230;. All of this is the application of a scientific approach.</p>
<p>Do you want an successful business venture? There is no better way to assure that than to use a scientific approach.</p>
<p>But then again the same thing can be said about every aspect of your lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
