<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science of Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/science-of-spam.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/science-of-spam.html</link>
	<description>Science Blog from Freelance Science Writer David Bradley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/science-of-spam.html/comment-page-1#comment-576047</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 07:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=2636#comment-576047</guid>
		<description>Mitten, I think that still is a trick that spammers use. The biggest problem with CAN-Spam is that it is totally irrelevant. It only applies to senders in the US and since anyone can offshore their email servers they have an instant get-out and can essentially do what they like. All it has really done is to add a layer of bureaucracy for legitimate companies in the US that now have to make sure that their marketing complies with the Act and add a footnote to all their emails, which means more electrons wasted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitten, I think that still is a trick that spammers use. The biggest problem with CAN-Spam is that it is totally irrelevant. It only applies to senders in the US and since anyone can offshore their email servers they have an instant get-out and can essentially do what they like. All it has really done is to add a layer of bureaucracy for legitimate companies in the US that now have to make sure that their marketing complies with the Act and add a footnote to all their emails, which means more electrons wasted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitten</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/science-of-spam.html/comment-page-1#comment-575935</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=2636#comment-575935</guid>
		<description>The CAN-SPAM Act makes it a requirement to include an opt out link in all email newsletters.  I remember when this used to be a trick to try and get someone to cilck an opt out link to verify an active email account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CAN-SPAM Act makes it a requirement to include an opt out link in all email newsletters.  I remember when this used to be a trick to try and get someone to cilck an opt out link to verify an active email account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: www.sciencebase.com @ 2012-02-10 01:15:57 -->
