Comments on: Double Tennis Racquet Racket

By: BILL

BILL — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:19:44 +0000

PLEASE DESCRIBE THE WHIP GRIP. THANKS

By: Lee

Lee — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 05:40:18 +0000

Muller didn’t seem to have mastered the necessary skill for this clip. But this shouldn’t detract from his point of hitting forehand on both sides. He did not recoil or make body turns to generate power. This may be because of the two racquets interfering with each other or because of his lack of good fundamentals. An ambidextrous player should be able to use the SAME racquet and hit forehand on both sides without having to carry two racquets and all there awkwardness.

Some argue that backhand is actually the stronger shot. Then potentially a deft and skilled ambidextrous may also choose to hit every shot backhand. Not a bad idea, but one racquet would have been enough.

By: JuLio Banderas

JuLio Banderas — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 06:22:57 +0000

Great idea. I believe that being ambidextrous has inherent advantages.

I’m only 5 feet-eleven inches tall but I was good enough to be the main point-guard of the university basketball team during my college years.
I have even received several awards in basketball in spite of my lack of height. I owe this to my having trained hard to play with my left hand while my right hand is tied at my back.

Now that I am no longer a spring chicken, I now into senior inter-club tennis competitions for the past twenty years, and I will definitely start a rigorous program to train playing DOUBLE TENNIS RACQUET tennis.

Thanks for the idea.

By: David Bradley

David Bradley — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:24:46 +0000

Yes, I imagine it’s quite difficult keeping control of your balls with a tennis racquet in each hand ;-)

By: Andrew Sun

Andrew Sun — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 14:45:54 +0000

I doubt the balls didn’t all hit the right place…