<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dawkins Delusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/the-dawkins-delusion.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/the-dawkins-delusion.html</link>
	<description>Science Blog from Freelance Science Writer David Bradley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/the-dawkins-delusion.html/comment-page-2#comment-628833</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=3829#comment-628833</guid>
		<description>In what way is Dawkins unethical. He&#039;s not actually &quot;doing&quot; science when he writes his books, he&#039;s communicating his thoughts and interpretations of reality and positing opinions, we have freedom of speech in most of the developed world, right. Contrast that with the nature of the attempted proselytisations made in the name of fundamental philosophies.

By the way, Dawkins isn&#039;t mentioned on that QuicheMoraine page you mentioned or did I miss it...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what way is Dawkins unethical. He&#8217;s not actually &#8220;doing&#8221; science when he writes his books, he&#8217;s communicating his thoughts and interpretations of reality and positing opinions, we have freedom of speech in most of the developed world, right. Contrast that with the nature of the attempted proselytisations made in the name of fundamental philosophies.</p>
<p>By the way, Dawkins isn&#8217;t mentioned on that QuicheMoraine page you mentioned or did I miss it&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Laden</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/the-dawkins-delusion.html/comment-page-2#comment-628829</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Laden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=3829#comment-628829</guid>
		<description>Is Richard Dawkins unethical?  (Because of the way he frames his argument?)  Interesting discussion going on &lt;a href=&quot;http://quichemoraine.com/2009/03/revenge-of-daughter-of-the-replace-michele-bachmann-blog-carnival/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here. &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Richard Dawkins unethical?  (Because of the way he frames his argument?)  Interesting discussion going on <a href="http://quichemoraine.com/2009/03/revenge-of-daughter-of-the-replace-michele-bachmann-blog-carnival/" rel="nofollow">here. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/the-dawkins-delusion.html/comment-page-2#comment-628815</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=3829#comment-628815</guid>
		<description>I knew someone would&#039;ve used that title already ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew someone would&#8217;ve used that title already ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Forder</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/the-dawkins-delusion.html/comment-page-2#comment-628813</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Forder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=3829#comment-628813</guid>
		<description>Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery! There is actually a book of the same title: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dawkins_Delusion?. I can&#039;t guarantee you&#039;ll like it, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery! There is actually a book of the same title: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dawkins_Delusion?" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dawkins_Delusion?</a>. I can&#8217;t guarantee you&#8217;ll like it, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/the-dawkins-delusion.html/comment-page-2#comment-628807</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=3829#comment-628807</guid>
		<description>Oh, yes, it&#039;s definitely a possible fraud and &quot;passing off&quot; to cybersquat, at least in the UK, and presumably the US. Although if you don&#039;t actually make any claims about actually being the person...

If it was @Coca_Cola, and they were a Pepsi affiliate it would be even more obvious than the fake Dawkins tweets, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yes, it&#8217;s definitely a possible fraud and &#8220;passing off&#8221; to cybersquat, at least in the UK, and presumably the US. Although if you don&#8217;t actually make any claims about actually being the person&#8230;</p>
<p>If it was @Coca_Cola, and they were a Pepsi affiliate it would be even more obvious than the fake Dawkins tweets, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/the-dawkins-delusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-628806</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=3829#comment-628806</guid>
		<description>It hadn&#039;t occurred to me that impersonating a celebrity could in fact be lucrative until you gave the details of this one. I suppose that it isn&#039;t strictly illegal and so I imagine it will continue.  I think I will make it a rule to only follow non-celebs from now on (Stephen Fry excepted.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It hadn&#8217;t occurred to me that impersonating a celebrity could in fact be lucrative until you gave the details of this one. I suppose that it isn&#8217;t strictly illegal and so I imagine it will continue.  I think I will make it a rule to only follow non-celebs from now on (Stephen Fry excepted.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Sun</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/the-dawkins-delusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-628798</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=3829#comment-628798</guid>
		<description>I was followed by Brad Pitt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was followed by Brad Pitt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/the-dawkins-delusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-635257</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=3829#comment-635257</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;The Dawkins Delusion: On sibling site Sciencetext.com I talk tech, which often includes warning people about spa.. http://tr.im/hZbB&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">The Dawkins Delusion: On sibling site Sciencetext.com I talk tech, which often includes warning people about spa.. <a href="http://tr.im/hZbB" rel="nofollow">http://tr.im/hZbB</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/the-dawkins-delusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-628795</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=3829#comment-628795</guid>
		<description>We certainly need to out the impostors otherwise Twitter will become worthless as more and more spoof celebs start spamming the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We certainly need to out the impostors otherwise Twitter will become worthless as more and more spoof celebs start spamming the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Maynard</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/the-dawkins-delusion.html/comment-page-1#comment-628794</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Maynard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/?p=3829#comment-628794</guid>
		<description>Thanks David,

Great follow-through on the Twitter conversation.  While the fake posts didn&#039;t seem to be malicious in any way, the more that can be done to &quot;out&quot; misleading impostors, the better methinks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David,</p>
<p>Great follow-through on the Twitter conversation.  While the fake posts didn&#8217;t seem to be malicious in any way, the more that can be done to &#8220;out&#8221; misleading impostors, the better methinks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
