<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UB313 Xena</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ub313-xena.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ub313-xena.html</link>
	<description>Science Blog from Freelance Science Writer David Bradley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sciencebase</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ub313-xena.html/comment-page-1#comment-8296</link>
		<dc:creator>sciencebase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ub313-xena.html#comment-8296</guid>
		<description>Science writer Edmund Blair Bolles raises a fascinating point regarding the nature of scientific discovery as it applies to the &quot;discovery&quot; that Pluto may not be a planet after all.

&quot;Whatever the ultimate decision,&quot; he says on the NASW-Talk list, &quot;it will
be a decision, not a fact and not a theory.&quot; In other words, there is no experiment that could be carried out to test this, no observations need be made, and there will be no scientific paradigm shift whatever the final outcome of the ongoing meeting, only effectively another (political) decision regarding our place in the universe, or the solar system, at least.

Bolles adds that, &quot;Back in the time of Copernicus saying the sun was not a planet, was a big deal, as was the claim that the earth was one.&quot; The current argument is probably not quite so important, but it does hint that much of scientific thought is based on taxonomy and language, says Bolles, rather than the testing of theories with scientific experiments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science writer Edmund Blair Bolles raises a fascinating point regarding the nature of scientific discovery as it applies to the &#8220;discovery&#8221; that Pluto may not be a planet after all.</p>
<p>&#8220;Whatever the ultimate decision,&#8221; he says on the NASW-Talk list, &#8220;it will<br />
be a decision, not a fact and not a theory.&#8221; In other words, there is no experiment that could be carried out to test this, no observations need be made, and there will be no scientific paradigm shift whatever the final outcome of the ongoing meeting, only effectively another (political) decision regarding our place in the universe, or the solar system, at least.</p>
<p>Bolles adds that, &#8220;Back in the time of Copernicus saying the sun was not a planet, was a big deal, as was the claim that the earth was one.&#8221; The current argument is probably not quite so important, but it does hint that much of scientific thought is based on taxonomy and language, says Bolles, rather than the testing of theories with scientific experiments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sciencebase</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ub313-xena.html/comment-page-1#comment-8294</link>
		<dc:creator>sciencebase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ub313-xena.html#comment-8294</guid>
		<description>Whoops. Thanks for spotting that. To hasty in my efforts to get a cheap astronomical laugh along the lines of The Register report...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops. Thanks for spotting that. To hasty in my efforts to get a cheap astronomical laugh along the lines of The Register report&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ub313-xena.html/comment-page-1#comment-8287</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/ub313-xena.html#comment-8287</guid>
		<description>&quot;Unfortunately for Pluto, Uranus is much bigger and their orbits cross&quot;

I assume you mean Neptune rather than Uranus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Unfortunately for Pluto, Uranus is much bigger and their orbits cross&#8221;</p>
<p>I assume you mean Neptune rather than Uranus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
