<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What are Significant Figures?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html</link>
	<description>Science Blog from Freelance Science Writer David Bradley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html/comment-page-2#comment-637220</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html#comment-637220</guid>
		<description>Yes, that really applies across the board doesn&#039;t it? You simply cannot introduce precision that is not in the original measurements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that really applies across the board doesn&#8217;t it? You simply cannot introduce precision that is not in the original measurements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Lednicer</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html/comment-page-2#comment-637218</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Lednicer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html#comment-637218</guid>
		<description>Formal analytical chemistry requires that the number of places used in every step in a chain calculation be cut back to the number of significant places delivered by the original measurement(weight, instrument reading etc...). The cut should not be left to the last step. Calculations carried out on hand calculators (which can be cut to the sigificant value) will often vary slightly from those using a spreadsheet (which are a pain to round at each step)..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Formal analytical chemistry requires that the number of places used in every step in a chain calculation be cut back to the number of significant places delivered by the original measurement(weight, instrument reading etc&#8230;). The cut should not be left to the last step. Calculations carried out on hand calculators (which can be cut to the sigificant value) will often vary slightly from those using a spreadsheet (which are a pain to round at each step)..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html/comment-page-1#comment-637209</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 07:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html#comment-637209</guid>
		<description>@Anonymous It&#039;s not. 7.89+5.876+3.1 = 16.866 but to 3 sig figs that 16.9. Dunno where you get 13.8 from...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anonymous It&#8217;s not. 7.89+5.876+3.1 = 16.866 but to 3 sig figs that 16.9. Dunno where you get 13.8 from&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html/comment-page-1#comment-637208</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 06:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html#comment-637208</guid>
		<description>hmm Example :7.89+5.876+3.1=13.866 but why is the answer is 13.8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm Example :7.89+5.876+3.1=13.866 but why is the answer is 13.8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html/comment-page-1#comment-635778</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 10:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html#comment-635778</guid>
		<description>Thanks, u saved my ass from my AS exams next week. This is the only thing I am loosing marks at :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, u saved my ass from my AS exams next week. This is the only thing I am loosing marks at :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harmon</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html/comment-page-1#comment-63646</link>
		<dc:creator>Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html#comment-63646</guid>
		<description>When I teach sig figs to my General Chemistry students, I advise them to delay rounding to the correct number of sig figs until the end of the calculation. This helps avoid introducing additional rounding errors. (Of course, carrying all 9 extra non-sig figs is overkill. One extra should do it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I teach sig figs to my General Chemistry students, I advise them to delay rounding to the correct number of sig figs until the end of the calculation. This helps avoid introducing additional rounding errors. (Of course, carrying all 9 extra non-sig figs is overkill. One extra should do it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lednicer</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html/comment-page-1#comment-61953</link>
		<dc:creator>Lednicer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/what-are-significant-figures.html#comment-61953</guid>
		<description>To add an extra complication most spreadsheet  programs such as Lotus and Excel carry out calculations out to 14 (Lotus) or so decimal places no matter what shows on the screen. The Format command only modifies the display NOT the value being used. There is a way to limit the places used in calculations but it is a real pain as there is no global command; it must instead be applied individually to each value every time it appears. 

This poses a real problem in multistep operations required to calculate analyses that must be submitted to regulatory authorities. Real differences in final numbers can be seen in values calculated by a good hand calculator and those obtained from a spreadsheet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add an extra complication most spreadsheet  programs such as Lotus and Excel carry out calculations out to 14 (Lotus) or so decimal places no matter what shows on the screen. The Format command only modifies the display NOT the value being used. There is a way to limit the places used in calculations but it is a real pain as there is no global command; it must instead be applied individually to each value every time it appears. </p>
<p>This poses a real problem in multistep operations required to calculate analyses that must be submitted to regulatory authorities. Real differences in final numbers can be seen in values calculated by a good hand calculator and those obtained from a spreadsheet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: www.sciencebase.com @ 2012-02-10 04:53:49 -->
