«  ||  »

What is the Structure of Taxol

Posted in Chemspy at 1:40 pm by David Bradley

Bookmark and Share

I’m a bit confused, I had assumed that the complete stereochemistry of the anticancer drug Taxol (paclitaxel) had been assigned years ago, presumably at the point when its first total synthesis was performed if not before. I’ve written about the compound several times, in particular reporting that first total synthesis of the compound in the UK paper, The Daily Telegraph.

Taxol structure

However, it seems there is ambiguity spreading across the net. Most notably, ChemSpider’s Tony Williams tells me (and has blogged about it), there is a potential discrepancy in the structure of Taxol given in Wikipedia.

Now, I know for a fact that Wikipedian chemist Martin Walker (see my recent interview with him in Reactive Reports) who is a member of the ChemSpider advisory board will already be on the case to double check and check again the structure in Wikipedia.

Aside from the politics of open access information and data, it is crucial that services like ChemSpider and Wikipedia give their users the correct structure for any given compound. There must be dozens of synthetic organic chemists who have carried out full stereochemical assignments on Taxol and know for certain the correct structure. Perhaps it’s time we had a referendum so that the winning structure could be posted to Wikipedia and other information repositories.

Bookmark and Share

5 Responses to “What is the Structure of Taxol”

  1. mukesh jindal says:

    send me stereocenter and stereochemistry of taxol

  2. The structure on the page you highlighted is correct

    I’ve gotten to the bottom of the correct structure at this page: http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=168

    It indicates how complex this issue of Open Access data and quality is…

  3. chemspy says:

    Is the structure correct in the original paper from Holton et al? He displays the structure on his page here

    db

  4. There are comments showing up on the blog. http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=164

    However, even thought there is some consistency I don’t think it’s nailed down. At present my belief is the structure is correct as shown, and correct on the linked DrugBank structure but INCorrect in Pubchem. But that’s a judgment….