Large Hadron Collider FAQ

The Large Hadron Collider is big, big news at the moment. Described as the biggest, most complicated machine ever built it will hopefully help physicists solve some of the great mysteries of space and time, such as: What happened a trillionth of a second after the Big Bang? Why does matter have mass? Where did all the antimatter go? Are there seven more dimensions wrapped up very, very small indeed? What happens when you make a microscopic black hole travelling at 99.999999% the speed of light in a giant metal ring beneath 100 metres in the Swiss countryside?

Well, here’s a short primer to bring you up to speed on the LHC and the so-called God Particle it hopes to find.

What is the Large Hadron Collider?

It is an internationally funded research installation based at CERN on the Swiss-French border. It is composed of millions of parts, weighing tens of thousands of tonnes in total and situated 100 metres below ground. It is shaped like an enormous, hollow doughnut, a torus shape, with various instruments and controls stationed around the ring at strategic points. Thousands of scientists and engineers have worked on the LHC and thousands will be involved in the research carried out. there.

What’s the operating temperature of the LHC?

It will operate at -271 Celsius, that’s an extremely chilly 1.9 degrees above absolute zero.

What will the LHC do?

Put simply, the LHC will create beams of particles, known as hadrons, that will travel around the ring at speeds approaching that of the speed of light. Ultimately two beams travelling in opposite directions will be created and allowed to collide. The high-energy collision (7 tera-electronvolts; 0.23×10-7 Joules roughly the equivalent of a head-on collision between two fruit flies but packed into a subatomic volume) will mimic conditions in the universe a trillionth of a second after the Big Bang and hopefully give scientists new insights into matter, energy, space, time, and other dimensions.

What is a hadron?

A hadron (pronounced had-ron, as opposed to hay-dron) is any sub-atomic particle composed of quarks and/or gluons. They include the well-known protons and neutrons found in the atomic nucleus. but also include the more exotic lambda and omega particles, pions and kaons.

What are the various instruments around the ring and what will they measure?

Atlas – A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS (a rather contrived acronym, if ever there was one) is a general purpose detector and will spot all kinds of particles produced by hadron collisions.

CMS – Compact Muon Solenoid – is also a general purpose detector that can measure the energy and momentum of photons (particles of light), electrons (particles of electricity), muons (superheavy electrons).

LHCb – LHC-beauty – a detector aimed at spotting symmetry violations in specific hadron collisions.

ALICE – A Large Ion Collider Experiment – the main particle tracking device.

TOTEM – Total Cross Section, Elastic Scattering and Diffraction Dissociation – does what it says on the tin, measures various energies.

LHCf – LHC-forward – measures any bow wave effects during a hadron collision.

How much has it cost?

2.6 billion pounds (about $4.6 billion) with the Collider itself costing about two-thirds of that and the detectors a third.

What’s the cost to the UK?

Apparently, it works out at about the price of a pint of beer per year for every person in the country.

Isn’t that a waste of money, what about curing HIV and cancer?

Scientists are spending more than that on finding cures for HIV and cancer, this is additional research. Moreover, the results from this study could revolutionise not only physics but the way we see the world and the technologies and medicine we might one day create. Sceptics said something similar about the discovery of the electron in 1897, and look where that discovery has taken us so far.

What does CERN stand for?

Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire’ (in English the European Council for Nuclear Research).

So, this is all about weapons?

Not at all, the nuclear refers only to the fact that the research is into the nucleus of the atom.

Where does the God particle come into all this?

The so-called God particle, is known as the Higgs boson. This is a hypothetical sub-atomic particle thought to endow matter with its substance, its mass and so is closely related to gravity. The particle was postulated by three physicists, François Englert and Robert Brout, and Peter Higgs who hypothesised its existence in 1964. If its existence is proven by LHC experiments it will validate the Standard Model of modern physics and provide the foundations for deriving a Grand Unified Theory of everything.

When will they start doing actual experiments rather than tests?

The LHC is the most complex machine ever built, millions of components have to work together in perfect harmony before hadron collisions can begin, it will be weeks, if not months, before the scientists carry out the first actual experiments to search for the God Particle.

Will we hear about the results as soon as the first experiments are done?

Once experiments are underway, the LHC will be producing petabytes of data (a petabyte is a billion megabytes), which simply cannot be processed by even today’s supercomputers. CERN is developing an ultrapowerful distributed Grid computing network (like email on steroids) that will process the data and give the thousands of scientists material to work with for years to come. My guess is that the first scientific paper of import from LHC will not be published until at least 2010, although preliminary results will no doubt appear before that.

Does the Big Bang theory hinge on the existence of the Higgs boson?

No, not at all. Higgs and his colleagues simply postulated a framework to explain why particles are made of stuff, i.e. have a mass.

What happens if the LHC does not find the Higgs boson?

A null result for the Higgs will imply that the BEH mechanism of how matter gets its mass is probably wrong, which will in turn imply that the Standard Model of modern physics is also wrong. However, the LHC results will not be wasted as Stephen Hawking and others predict that something even more bizarre will emerge from the collisions that will help scientists construct new theories. Some scientists are even hoping that they won’t find the Higgs as what they will find could be even more exciting.

Will the LHC produce a black hole that will suck the earth into it and kill us all in a primordial vortex of doom?

No.

Really?

Yes. Although the LHC is a huge experiment creating massive energies, these are similar to the millions of collisions that take place between hadrons in the earth’s upper atmosphere as cosmic rays bombard the planet. With long odds of 50-billion to 1 against of a microscopic black hole even forming, the chances of it not simply falling apart on its creation and spawning a shower of new and exotic particles are as close to zero as you can get.

So Torchwood has got it wrong?

Most certainly. Captain Jack John Barrowman may have visited the LHC during its erection but I think he was hoping to experience not a large hadron collision but something typographically different.

Where can I watch the LHC Rap?

Right here.

Will there be an Extra Large Hadron Collider?

Yes. Eventually. Although the LHC is big and high power, it is just one in a long(ish) line of colliders of increasing power. It will only be able to peer back in time to the first trillionth of a second after the Big Bang, inevitably scientists will want to push that limit further by going to higher energies, which means a bigger still collider.

Credits: LHC Schematic drawn by Wikipedia contributor Arpad Horvath. You can read a comment from Sciencebase reader Dr Walter L. Wagner on the subject of black holes and revelations here.

Antioxidants, fingerprint testing, peers

These are the latest science news links and snippets from Sciencebase:

  • Healthy antioxidants may do more harm than good – This has been my hunch for years. Now, scientists (J Agric Food Chem, ACS) are calling for more research on the possibility that some supposedly healthy plant-based antioxidants – including those that supposedly prevent cancer – may actually aggravate or even cause cancer in some people.
  • Intelligent Fingerprinting – Testing for illicit drugs often falls foul of fraud and mislabelling of urine or blood samples. New technology from Cambridge company Intelligent Fingerprinting could avoid all that simply by taking fingerprints from a suspected user and testing those instead of a urine sample for recent drug abuse. The fact that their fingerprint represents is the sample means no more mixups and no chance for fraudulent swapping of samples.
  • Interview With Jean-Claude Bradley (no relation) on the impact of open notebook science – Jean-Claude Bradley is an organic chemist at Drexel University in Philadelphia. As with most scientists, Bradley used to be very secretive. He kept his research under wraps until publication and frequently applied for patents on his work in nanotechnology and gene therapy.
  • Write for Oprah? Wrong for Me – Sounds like debunking health myths has a different meaning when it comes to the big O. Can you define "good morning" what do you mean by good and what hours constitute the pre-afternoon period?
  • Peer to Peer Mentoring – Peer-mentoring schemes have been around since ancient times, they even get a mention in Greek texts, but today they are becoming increasingly popular in academic environments as educators begin to recognise the benefits for their students of learning with a little help from their friends.
  • Why scientists are waiting for Web 3.0 – Personally, I'd be happy with web 2.1, but it seems that scientists in general are holding out their enthusiasm for web 3.0

Phantom radiation protection

Ionizing radiation exists as either subatomic particles (alpha and beta particles, and neutrons) or photons (electromagnetic waves at X-ray and gamma ray wavelengths, i.e. energies of a few electron volts). The energy from such radiation can strip electrons from atoms or molecules, thus ionizing them, but it has to have an energy above a certain threshold. An intense flood of particles or photons will not cause ionization if the individual particles do not have enough energy. The energy of a photon correlates with its frequency (it is inversely proportional to its wavelength). So, radiation of short wavelength are high-frequency ultraviolet, X-ray, and gamma rays, and are thus ionizing, whereas visible light, infra-red, microwave, and radio waves with much lower frequencies but longer wavelengths are non-ionising.

High-energy ionising radiation, which comes from natural radioactive sources, particle accelerators, and X-ray machines, is a well-established risk factor for human cancer. Exposure to radiation causes damage to living tissue, DNA damage and at low doses can cause tumour growth. At high dose, skin burns, radiation sickness and death occur.

Epidemiology based on patients treated with ionising radiation, survivors of atomic bomb blasts, and uranium workers, has revealed the risks of leukaemia, lung cancer and various tumour types associated with exposure. Equally well known, of course, is that ionising radiation has many practical uses in medicine. X-rays in imaging and other forms of ionising radiation in cancer therapy, for instance. Alpha particles, beta particles, positrons, gamma emitters, protons and X-rays are all uses to either deliberately cause ionisation to kill malignant cells or as a way of highlighting different types of tissue or diseased cells within the body.

Radiological and nuclear medicine confer a long-term risk of cancer, explains Mauro Valente of the University of Cordoba, and this risk applies not only to patients undergoing examination or treatment but also to healthcare staff and even those simply visiting a patient in hospital. Valente and his colleagues have now turned to statistical tools to help them map out the risk and to offer new boundaries to improve safety for those working in radiology and nuclear medicine.

They have developed a computational tool with an easy to use graphical user interface (GUI) based on a form of statistical analysis known as a Monte Carlo technique. The tool takes into account, the configuration of the treatment or examination room, the specific ionising radiation being used and the shape and size of the individual being irradiated.

“The first preliminary investigation confirmed that the introduced user-defined geometry was satisfactorily capable of mimicking typical treatment room,” the team says, “With the aim of representing realistic situations, all target ‘phantom’ positions were defined in such a way that at every simulated location the target phantom would mimic a person viewing the patient.”

The tool can process the necessary data and produce the corresponding graphic visualisation of potential radiation exposure for any area within a treatment room, the team adds.

“The developed system may be used for the study, characterization and quantification of exposure levels associated with specific arrangements of treatment room and facilities,” Tirao told Sciencebase. “In particularly, it is possible for each user (expert or not) to introduce the specific treatment room characteristics, facilities and patient disposition, locations where medical and technical staff are typically positioned during treatments and so on.”

In addition, the system allows the user to specify isotope emission properties, like radiation type (beta or gamma), emission spectrum and activity distribution.

“The implementation of this system may help in the assessment of exposure levels according to actual treatment room and typical exposed people locations as well as specifying radiation source distribution and emission properties,” he adds. “Authorities and departments responsible may take advantage from this information with the aim of reducing occupational exposure levels as well as minimizing the risks for occasionally exposed people, like the patient’s family.”

Research Blogging IconMauro Valente, Francisco Malano, & Germán Tirao (2010). A computational tool for evaluating the exposure risk in nuclear medicine treatments Int. J. Low Radiation, 7 (4), 333-346

  • Radiation sickness – All Information
  • Unforgivable medical errors, revisited
  • Who’s afraid of radiation?
  • Radiologists call for national strategy to address medical imaging overuse

Research in the past and structural correctness

These are the latest science news links and snippets from Sciencebase:

  • Scientific Research in the Past – Literally a blast from the past: This item about science in museums and finding a job in museum research was posted on Sciencebase.com way back in 2005, but was originally an “Adapt or Die” feature article for the now-defunct BioMedNet.com
  • Are you sure that structure is right? – UK chemists have developed a computer program that can work out how likely a chemical structure is to be correct, or identify the right structure from a range of possibilities.
  • Cancer Carnival #37 – Bayblab hosts the 37th edition of the cancer blog carnival.
  • Latest arXiv preprint shows you how to store entanglement – “Stuff” is the way many physicists are beginning to think of entanglement: as a resource, rather like water or energy, to be called upon when needed in the new quantum world. These physicists want to be able to create entanglement, use it and store it whenever they need to.
  • A bumper harvest of biofuel news from C&EN – Lots of clean tech, green energy, alternative fuels info from the ACS’ blog
  • Magnetic leaves – Researchers have used a fig leaf as a template to produce a complex, hierarchical structure from the magnetic and conductive material iron carbide. X-ray powder diffraction allowed them to reveal how the biological template was able to create an intricate vascular structure in a ceramic product.

Spectroscopy now!

These are the latest science news links and snippets from Sciencebase:

  • Diabetics drop the needle – A new device based on Raman spectroscopy has been developed by scientists at MIT to help patients with diabetes monitor their blood glucose levels without needing to prick their fingers to take a blood sample.
  • Pocket spotted – Researchers have identified a new class of chemicals that bind to a previously unknown allosteric pocket-a pocket outside the enzyme active site-and inhibit the enzyme FPPS. The work could have implications for new treatments of bone diseases, Paget's disease and tumour-induced bone degradation.
  • Infrared watermarks – Water molecules continuously form short-lived clusters that can be rapidly protonated in the liquid state. Now, computer simulations revealed how protonated water clusters interact with nearby messenger molecules, which are required to measure their geometrical structures and the chemical properties by IR spectroscopy.
  • Dollar signs and the brain – Functional magnetic resonance imaging has revealed a region of the brain about two inches above the left eyebrow that lights up whenever a person anticipating a reward for a task performed successfully is shown a dollar sign. The response is linked to dopamine release in response to pre-determined cues of which a symbol for money is one.
  • Top ten writing tips for scientists – If you’re more at home with numbers than words, writing can be a difficult prospect. Learning a few simple techniques can make all the difference, according to Sciencebase guest contributor Rob Ashton.
  • Dental care without toothpaste – Hmmm…they're apparently still testing this toothpaste-free toothbrush, but the blurb says: "The Soladey-J3DX toothbrush is powered by natural sunlight and brings teeth brushing to a new technological plateau. It does away with toothpaste because the embedded solar panel in the centre of the toothbrush can transmit electrons which react with the acid in the saliva to fight plague and bacteria." Like I said. Hmmm…