Pills, thrills and polymorphs

Almost any skilled organic chemist could create novel variations on the solid form, polymorphs, of small molecules currently used as pharmaceuticals. This represents a problem for manufacturers of generic drugs because big pharma attempts to extend the patent lifespan of its well-known products by adding such polymorphs to the patent.

Prasad Vure of Indian generics company Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd is concerned that the extended protection offered to the pioneer companies by polymorphs does not represent any significant scientific advance in medicine but is simply a way to stifle generic competition in the pharmaceutical market.

Dr Reddy’s manufacturers 190 medications, 60 active pharmaceutical ingredients for drug manufacture, diagnostic kits, critical care, and biotechnology products. The name may be rather familiar to anyone who has, for instance, received a prescription for an established medication under the UK National Health Service recently, as physicians are increasingly encouraged to opt for the generic prescription rather than the commonly more expensive proprietary drug for their patients. The issue of polymorphs and the patent extensions to expensive, original medications they might afford could preclude such generic savings across the NHS and in other parts of the world.

Pioneers, polymorphs and generic pharmaceuticals

“Pharmaceuticals can exist in various solid forms include ‘true polymorphs’, solvates, desolvates and amorphous solids,” explains Vure. He adds that screening of pharmaceuticals early on in drug discovery to find out all possible solid forms has significant connotations because the ‘wrong’ polymorph formed at the crystallisation stage can be far less effective than another and occasionally even toxic because it is absorbed at an inappropriate rate by the body and/or metabolised ineffectively. He points out that pioneer companies, those who first create the pharmaceutical product widely claim that patent claims for novel crystal forms is an important component of their intellectual property position, but that it significantly delays the entry of generic versions of drugs once original patents expire and so stifles the free market.

“There are numerous instances where innovator companies have acquired patents on a particular polymorphic form,” says Vure, “which extend beyond the expiry of basic molecule’s patent.” However, the converse can also benefit generics manufacturers briefly if they can obtain certification for a novel, active and safe polymorph of a patent-expired drug. Such a filing will give the generic manufacturer exclusive marketing rights for 180 days and a healthy market share ahead of other generic competition.

Polymorphic resonance

Success with a polymorph patent rests almost exclusively with the uniqueness of the X-ray diffraction pattern for the specific polymorph, if a pioneer company can demonstrate that a generic manufacturer is infringing on the basis of the XRD data then patents are usually upheld. Conversely, if a single peak is absent then the generic company can, rarely defeat the pioneer in court with the “novelty” of its polymorph. However, Vure points out that approximations in the XRD data blur the distinction between visible peaks and missing peaks more often than not in favour of the pioneer company rather than the generic manufacturer.

12 pioneering pharmaceuticals with polymorph patents

  • Allegra (Fexofenadine) – Sanofi – Originally 1979, polymorph 1994
  • Cozaar (Losartan) – Merck – Orig. 1986, poly 1993
  • Clarinex (Desloratadine) – Schering-Plough – Orig. 1984, poly 1997
  • Duricef (Cefadroxil) – Warner Chilcott – Orig. 1967, poly 1977
  • Epivir (Lamivudine) – GlaxoSmithkline – Orig. 1989, poly 1992
  • Geodon (Ziprasidone) – Pfizer – Orig. 1988, poly 1992
  • Omnicef (Cefdinir) – Abbott – Orig. 1980, 1988
  • Paxil (Paroxetine) – GlaxoSmithkline – Orig. 1974, poly 1986, 1995
  • Pepcid (Famotidine) – Merck – Orig. 1979, poly 1987
  • Valtrex (Valacyclovir) – GlaxoSmithkline – Orig. 1988, poly 1996
  • Zantac (Ranitidine) – GlaxoSmithkline – Orig. 1977, poly 1981
  • Zoloft (Sertaline) – Pfizer – Orig. 1979, poly 1992

You can read the introduction to my report for Thomson Reuters on The Changing Role of the Pharma Industry here and download the full report for free as a PDF.

Research Blogging IconPrasad Vure (2011). Polymorph patents; how strong they are really? Int. J. Intellectual Property Management, 4 (4), 297-306

Comment is not free

UPDATE: 2011-12-08 I lasted just over a week, but couldn’t bear the silence…commenting is open again on posts dating back up to 30 days, although commenting on anything older or on legacy pages from Elemental Discoveries and the pre-Wordpress incarnation of Sciencebase is disabled.

As of 2011-12-01 the Sciencebase Science Blog will no longer be accepting comments on posts and pages nor in its guestbook. I have been running the site under the WordPress content management (CMS) platform for several years now, although the site has actually existed since July 1999 and in that time comment spam has grown considerably.

The site has published more than 2000 posts in the WordPress system with a couple of hundred more under my old web design and those posts have generated more than 7000 legitimate comments from interested readers (for which many thanks). Unfortunately, in that same time period, the Akismet anti-spam plugin has blocked over 730,000 spam comments and that does not include the spam that was blocked by IP before it hit the plugin nor by the various other spam filters I’ve tested over the years. So, just 1% of comment traffic is genuine discussion the rest is ads for SEO, Ugg boots, pr0n, drugs and other nonsense.

Now, I know every other blogger has to put up with comments, but I’m taking a leaf out of Seth Godin’s book and am now disabling commenting on Sciencebase altogether. If you wish to discuss any particular post, then you can more usefully do so on the social media sites where Sciencebase has a presence: Twitter, Facebook and Google+. Feel free to share, tweet and like posts on those and any other site you favour. I will try to respond to comments on those three in a timely manner, but cannot guarantee to pick up comments on other sites. If you have any problems with this new policy let me know. Comments will remain open on this post until the end of Movember (GMT).

Bristling bristles

UPDATE: 28th November. It’s been a long, hard struggle, but finally after four weeks I have something on my upper lip that you might refer to as a “mo”, it’s unruly, asymmetric and littered with stray blonde hairs… I’m sure if I’d let the hair on my chin grow I’d look like Rip Van Winkel by now, but the tache task, the trivial pursuit of making the upper lip hirsute is the aim of Movember, and while I’m no Lech Walesa there is hair to be seen, so I updated the words to my Movember Blues…see below.

So, in cash-strapped times, I appreciate asking for donations for yet another charity is a big ask, but if you feel my song, tache or photo are not worth a couple of quid to the Movember cause, then perhaps a donation to Movember on behalf of my poor, suffering wife might be. If I have suffered making the mo grow, then she has lost out on nuptial affection for almost 30 days because she has been simply too scared to give me a kiss while the bristles bristled.

The Movember Blues No More

Woke up this morning, four weeks down the line,
Went to the bathroom mirror, to check it one more time

Imagine my surprise, I’m sure gonna grin,
There’s a few hairs growin’ on my lip and a few more on my chin

I got the Movember blues, not feeling very hip.
I got the Movember blues, at last some hair grew on my upper lip

30 days of growing, I’m almost quite hirsute,
Can’t believe we’re at the end of this trivial pursuit

On December 1st, it’s time to donate
This ‘tache will be coming off this scruffy reprobate

‘expect I’ll need some salve for this mo I will not miss
Thankful it’s not Movember my wife will get her Christmas kiss

I had the Movember blues, with hair all growing on my upper lip
I wanna thank you for support and for hands in pocket you’re all gonna dip…duh-dee-durh-dur-dee-daah-durrh-deee-dahh-durrrr, baam, burrrrrhhhh.*

You can donate via my Movember page here. Thanks!

*Standard blues ending…

The changing role of the pharma industry

The role of the drug discovery chemist has changed significantly over the past 50 years – workflows have been reinvented while the same goals remain to find and test novel molecules that can reach and act on disease targets.

In this, the International Year of Chemistry (IYC 2011), Thomson Reuters offers a timely report, written by David Bradley with research by Robert Slinn, that examines how life in drug discovery has changed and how it will continue to change and adapt in the future. The report analyzes and develops the major themes identified and highlighted by key players in the global pharmaceutical industry. Many of their insights are fully supported by analysis of data taken from the Thomson Reuters Integrity SM drug discovery database for the period 2001-2011.

In this report, we ask who will emerge as the major drug discoverers and the major drug developers during the next decade. What is the driver for change in the industry and will globalization and regulation have far reaching consequences for the role of the chemist? How will the numbers stack up in 2020 when we count the number of new chemical entities (NCEs): will the balance shift from conventional small molecule Pharma products to the burgeoning area of biologicals?

Future skills

We will discuss how the future skills base will evolve and whether or not there will be a shift in the balance of traditional disciplines. We will calculate the ratelimiting steps and ask if that will affect changing role of chemists. Does a dearth of experience in Pharma, biotech, or academia impact on the changes and what role, if any, might the professional bodies play in the future development of the industry.

TR IYC2011 report available as a PDF here.

PET molecules make sense

My old friend AP de Silva of Queen’s University Belfast has put together a video to explain how molecular logic based on luminescent PET (photoinduced electron transfer) is revolutionising smart medical diagnostics and could bring us a future generation of electronic gadgets based on molecular computing. de Silva and his team have been working on molecular logic since the early 1990s when I first reported on their logic and sensor research for New Scientist and other publications.

Share your slides using a QR code

Your talk went down very well, you got rapturous applause, and some delegates even began to stand…there were murmurings of a Nobel Prize. Now, the hard bit, all those eager students in the front row want a copy of your slides so they can emulate your greatness, or more likely nitpick and point out the flaws in your otherwise flawless logic. You really don’t want the inconvenience of collecting email addresses or worse swapping business cards. So, what’s the easy option for a busy speaker one the conference circuit? QR codes. Obviously.

But, isn’t creating QR codes for your documents a painful process that will add precious minutes to your speech preparation time? Not necessarily. A new service with the painful name of TagMyDoc allows you to add a tag to a document which can be scanned and retrieved as a virtual copy via a QR code, which you would, of course, display at the end of your talk so that all those delegates can scan it with their iPhones. The system supports the following file types: jpg, tiff, png, bmp, gif, doc, docx, ppt, pptx and pdf.

There is the inevitable mobile app – ScanMyDoc, which is the only TagMyDoc-ready QR reader at the moment, which also lets you sync ScanMyDoc with your TagMyDoc account and manage your scanned documents.

There is a Microsoft Office Add-in for Word that lets you tag and save your document directly and a similar Add-in for Microsoft PowerPoint, which lets you tag and save your presentation directly from Microsoft PowerPoint without ever leaving the application.

In a sense, TagMyDoc is the reverse process of printing – When you print, your document goes from a virtual form to a hard copy. This approach means a recipient can get a virtual copy of a document or presentation from a hard-copy form (print or on your lecture screen).

Is renewable energy just a myth?

It’s a question I’ve asked several times, indirectly on Sciencebase – is renewable sustainable or just a pipedream for blue-skies thinkers?

Dawn Stover suggests that it may well be: Renewable energy sounds so much more natural and believable than a perpetual-motion machine, but theres one big problem: Unless youre planning to live without electricity and motorized transportation, you need more than just wind, water, sunlight, and plants for energy. You need raw materials, real estate, and other things that will run out one day. You need stuff that has to be mined, drilled, transported, and bulldozed — not simply harvested or farmed.

Singing the Movember Blues no more

Movember (as in moustache November) grows annually, it’s a month-long event started in 1999 in Adelaide, Australia. Since 2004, the Movember Foundation charity has run Movember events to raise awareness and funds for men’s health issues, such as prostate cancer and depression, in Australia and New Zealand. In 2007, events were launched in Ireland, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Spain, the United Kingdom, Israel, South Africa, Taiwan and the United States. In 2010, Movember merged with the testicular cancer event Tacheback.

The rules

  1. Each mo bro must begin the 1st of Movember clean shaven – check
  2. For the entire month each mo bro must grow and groom a moustache – check
  3. There is to be no joining of the mo to your side burns – check
  4. There is to be no joining of the handlebars to your chin – check
  5. Each mo bro must conduct himself like a true country gentleman. – Not shot any game yet, but there’s plenty of time!

I made a start and saw very little upper-lip growth for many days, despite my chin getting heavily stubbled. I wrote a lyrical lament – The Mo’vember Blues – to draw attention to my plight. Thankfully, with just 9 days of growth to go, my lip is bristling with…well…bristles…it’s a somewhat unruly mess and would be laughed out of court if Lech Walesa were the protagonist, but it’s mine, I tell you, mine! May I stop singing The Mo’vember Blues? Is it finally worthy of a donation to the Movember cause?

The SoundCloud upload has had 48 listens, the Youtube clip has been watched 207 times, so not exactly viral…please give it a click and check out my Mo Bro page to make a donation…even if it is in pity.

What’s the best month to be born?

According to a post from Stuart Farrimond, there’s a wealth of data showing that your month of birth actually has a very small but noticeable difference in your long-term health. Not because of astrological nonsense, but because of exposure to sunlight, disease and other factors during critical developmental periods. For example, spring babies end up growing to be a quarter of an inch 6mm taller than autumn babies on average.

Some medical conditions are correlated with birth month. Schizophrenia is uncommon but the relative risk is increased 10% if you are born in the winter. May in the North isn’t good for multiple sclerosis, although November is riskiest for those in the Southern hemisphere.

I assume that the position you are in the school year affects much of your growth, development and health too, to some extent. If you’re born in September, you’ll be among the oldest in the school year. August babies, the youngest. That influences whether you’re ready to join a sports team at the beginning of the school year, for instance, which could have knock on effects throughout your student days.

A nice graphic in Current Biology charts the year and the risk of particular illnesses for each month. They’re all more than statistical chance and of course absolutely nothing to do with star sign. But, then I’m an Aquarius, always skeptical.

What’s the best month to be born?

Research Blogging IconFoster, R., & Roenneberg, T. (2008). Human Responses to the Geophysical Daily, Annual and Lunar Cycles Current Biology, 18 (17) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.003

The little book of black delights

Schadenfreude: pleasure derived from another’s misfortune. Black humour. The hilarity experienced in watching a pratfall, the clumsy slip on a well-placed banana skin. From the German compound noun, deriving from Schaden (adversity, harm) and Freude (joy). Obvious. Understanding the effects of schadenfreude on both the subject and observer is an important sub-branch of psychology. According to Wikipedia, a distinction exists between “secret schadenfreude” (a private feeling) and “open schadenfreude” (which is outright public derision or scorn).

In his latest book, Tim Lihoreau (author of the 2006 bestseller: Phobias – A litany of Contemporary Fears), inverts the proposition of fear and turns to delight, to schadenfreude. It was an absolute pleasure to see the title misspelled however temporarily on the recent Facebook press event page and to note that you can already pick up a copy on Amazon for half the price of the publisher’s original valuation. Would that be delight in watching a fellow author’s dwindling royalties cheque? Bibliodimunoregiuphilia, perhaps.

I, of course, jest. If you enjoy little black books, then Lihoreau’s latest offering with its almost Moleskine cover is just for you. This would be particularly the case if you have (and who hasn’t?) experienced either private or overt schadenfreude at another’s expense. In Lihoreau’s little black book you will find “lujocophilia”, the delight experienced by having a deep understanding of a particular technology, “niovemophilia”, the enjoyment inherent in dispelling myths and “vodeiectophilia” from the Latin for “verbal diarrhoea” the delight in talking without pause. I almost feel like this book was written for me…