Mental snip

I seem to have something of a reputation for a fertile imagination; don’t know why, although regular readers will know that I cover a lot of ground between my blog and a hard place. Anyway, Diane Richards pointed this out to me following a Facebook post about social networking for sex and about the most inappropriate orifices into which people insert the most inappropriate objects, so maybe I do.

Anyway, it occurred to me that someone with a fertile imagination could be stifled by the mental equivalent of a vasectomy, a mental snip, if you like.

I asked my twitter colleagues to suggest what they thought would be the equivalent of a vasectomy and some interesting responses have started rolling in.

First, was the pragmatic suggestion of tmtn that it would be an “innovation lobotomy” or “creativity-bypass surgery”. Jean-Charles Dordain lamented the current education system and equated a mental vasectomy to being “forced to sit down in a classroom and forced to think one way and only one way.”

Dennis D McDonald took it to a higher level with the notion of “Cutting off all Federal funding for public broadcasting” while zevans23 took a contrary view that “watching too much TV” would be the equivalent. Neil Withers threatened to bring the growing meme to a close by offering: “Joining Twitter”, but luckily Damien Ryan chipped in with “a BSc in Computer Science” being the closest thing to the mental snip. Liz Scherer suggested a good old-fashioned lobotomy and Joe Garde asked whether a biomedical solution was appropriate in terms of “the inability to produce serotonin”.

Anyway, that’s all the ideas that have come in at the time of writing, so I ask again:

What would be the mental equivalent of a vasectomy for someone with a fertile imagination?

2 thoughts on “Mental snip”

  1. Luckily, I have a private supply of tea and biscuits, so my need to attend meetings is minimal. I also have no one to say “no” to me when I come up with ludicrous blog ideas such as asking people for a mental analogy for a vasectomty ;-)

  2. I’ve been told many times that ‘meetings’ offer the required effect at least temporarily; the effect being enhanced by holding multiple meeting back to back. Personally, I enjoy meetings (I know, I know) but that may be the tea and biscuits!

    Personally, I think an organisation that is unwilling to take risks, even small ones, can kill innovative thinking or just loose its innovators. Tell someone ‘no’ enough times and they’ll stop asking.

Comments are closed.