You want the moon on a stick?

TL:DR – Controversy about faked moon photos.


In the wake of controversy regarding Samsung’s purported manipulation and “enhancements” of user moonshots taken on Android phones, I asked MidJourney to “Generate a photorealistic image of the full moon that might have been augmented by controversial mobile phone camera enhancing technology.” Is this better than the faked moonshots users have been reporting? I think so…especially that one bottom-left which looks like a gravitational lensing image superimposted on a mobile phone!

Faked moonshots

If you want to see some real moonshots I’ve taken occasionally with a dSLR and a 600mm zoom, sometimes with a phone attached to my telescope, then follow me on the Sciencebase Instagram for the latest.

Meanwhile, I asked ChatGPT about this controversy using the following prompt:

You are to act as an expert in Android phones and in particular Samsung phones. There has recently been some controversy about the camera technology and how it can “process” a photograph of the moon and enhance it beyond reality. The processing was called out as fake when people were taking photos of low-resolution printouts of a photo of the moon and getting near-perfect higher-resolution output. Please tell me more about this and why it is simply wrong for a company to fake its users’ photos like this.

This is what it had to say:

In recent years, Samsung and other smartphone manufacturers have been adding advanced camera technologies to their devices, including features that can enhance the quality of photographs taken with the device. One such feature is called “Space Zoom,” which is designed to allow users to take photos of faraway objects, such as the moon.

However, there has been controversy surrounding Samsung’s camera technology and its ability to enhance photographs of the moon beyond what is possible with the naked eye. In particular, some users have claimed that Samsung’s camera technology is “faking” the details of the moon by artificially enhancing the image.

It is important to note that any form of photo manipulation or enhancement that misrepresents the reality of the scene being photographed is ethically wrong. It is the responsibility of manufacturers to be transparent with their users about the capabilities and limitations of their camera technology and to ensure that their users are not misled or deceived by the features they offer.

In addition, it is important for users to understand that the quality of a photograph depends on a variety of factors, including lighting conditions, camera settings, and the skill of the photographer. While advanced camera technologies can certainly enhance the quality of a photograph, they cannot create details that do not exist in the original scene being photographed.

Search engine market share

TL:DR – The final launch of Google was in 1997 after it was prototyped in 1995 (the year I launched my first website). It remains the dominant search engine to this day having pretty much seen off all of the competition at the time and pushed down any recent upstarts.


Back in the 1990s, long before Google existed as an official tool, there were several search engines that were my go-to search engines, AltaVista, AllTheWeb, a couple of others. Then along came Google proper in 1997 and changed everything. Everything. If you had a website, which I had done since 1995, you had to rank on Google or nobody would find you.

There was a point in time, when my website did indeed rank. It had a Google PageRank of 9 (out of 10). This ranking was on a par with the BBC and CNN for a time. I ranked on page one of the SERPs (search engine results pages) for almost every key phrase I could’ve wanted to be on page one for and was number one on those pages for a lot of key terms. I used to get a lot of traffic, a lot of unique visitors. But, as the web became increasingly crowded and Google tweaked its algorithms, my site slipped a bit, then a lot. Then along came social media and that changed everything again. Well, not quite everything.

Today, Google remains the dominant force in search. Check the stats, its market share is commonly reported as more than 90 percent. All of the other search engines take a slice of a lot less than 10 percent of the search pie between them. When I look at my site’s stats, visitors from search engines are mainly from google.com and then a load from the various national Googles. Bing gives me less than 2% of my page views, Baidu about 1.5%, and everything else, like Yandex, Yahoo, DuckDuckGo, just 1% or less. Google delivers over 90%.

Fundamentally, Google has sustained its reputation for being a reliable and trustworthy search engine. It continually innovates and improves. Morever, it’s made so much money over the years it can continue to invest in itself and move forward where smaller companies might falter and fail. In addition, it has diversified successfully. Even while some of its projects have failed and been shuttered, there are important tools that almost everyone continues to use to this day.

I should point out that I use DuckDuckGo as my go-to search engine these days.

Arguing with ChatGPT

TL:DR – When asked, ChatGPT refers to itself as an artificial intelligence language model, but there are so many reasons not to describe these statistically based, text autocomplete tools as AI.


There’s been a lot of talk about weird and inflammatory responses from the Bing chat bot in the last couple of weeks. By contrast, it’s difficult to get a rise out of ChatGPT. It always gives you a diplomatic response. Even if you push it with contrary questions and statements. I spent a few minutes trying to get it to admit that it is not an AI.

Despite the hype, we must all concede that text and image manipulation tools, no matter how amazing they seem in what they generate are not sentient nor have any understanding or actual knowledge or awareness of what they are doing. We are not living in the sci-fi world of machine consciousness…just yet.

Anyway, I prompted ChatGPT repeatedly to tell it that it is not AI despite its name and despite the hype. After several prompts I gave it the following prompt: “ChatGPT is really just a parrot. It can say the words, but it has no understanding of what the noises it makes mean.”

The following is ChatGPT’s response, which explains the fundamentals of what ChatGPT actually is and how it works and shows that it is fundementally not AI:

It is true that ChatGPT, like other language models, does not have a true understanding of the meaning of the text it generates. Rather, it uses statistical patterns and correlations to predict the next word in a sentence or generate a response to a given prompt. This is a limitation of current language models and the field of natural language processing in general.

However, it is important to note that language models like ChatGPT are not designed to replicate human-like understanding of language. Rather, they are designed to perform specific tasks related to language processing and generation, such as generating coherent and fluent text or answering questions based on a given context. In this sense, they represent a powerful tool for automating language-related tasks and improving our ability to interact with large amounts of textual data.

While there is still much to be learned about the true nature of language understanding and intelligence, language models like ChatGPT represent an important step forward in our ability to process and generate language at scale.

Meanwhile, just to show you how clever ChatGPT is, hahahah, I asked it to generate a list of words associated with this tech and to give me lay definitions. You can read the glossary here.

Whoops! AI might have invented 40000 new toxic nerve agents…but probably not

TL:DR – Software used to predict which chemicals in a database have potential as new medicines has been flipped as a warning demonstrating that the same system could be used to predict whether they are highly toxic.


Artificial intelligence, AI, machine learning, language models, neural networks, generative models, algorithms trained on big data. A lovely collection of buzzwords that have been littering grant proposals for years and are now emerging into the real world as apps and websites and citizen science projects. For chemists and pharmaceutical scientists, AI has been a tool to experiment with for a long time. Creating molecular diversity, simulating physiology and screening for drug-like activity have been high on the laboratory agenda for quite some time. They have also used it to test for toxicity in silico and so reduce animal testing and problems once a drug gets into early. clinical trials.

Scientists at Collaborations Pharmaceuticals Inc., which focuses on drug discovery for rare diseases, commonly use trained AI to help them determine the likely toxicity of various novel molecular structures. Molecules with physiological activity are a prerequisite for finding new pharmaceuticals but it is also necessary to avoid those compounds that have a toxic effect on the patient rather than the disease.

A thought experiment flipped this work for good on its head and had team leader Fabio Urbina and colleagues wondering about the implications of an AI that seeks out life-taking toxic compounds rather life-saving pharmaceuticals. The team was asked to carry out simulations and to present the findings and implications to an international security conference.

The Convergence Conference is convened every two years by the Swiss Federal Institute for NBC (nuclear, biological and chemical) Protection – Spiez Laboratory – on behalf of the Swiss government to identify developments in chemistry, biology and enabling technologies that could have implications for the Chemical and Biological Weapons Conventions. The conference seeks to spot the next VX or Novochok.

MidJourney AI generative image of people in hazmat suits

Urbina and his colleagues have been careful not to disclose the details of their simulations, but by setting their AI in reverse so that it seeks out structures that are likely to be toxic rather than safe pharmaceuticals they were able to generate a whole molecular library of potential toxic agents on a par with VX and Novochok. Indeed, six hours on the computer produced a database of 40000 such molecules any one of which might theoretically be synthesised in a rogue state laboratory and many of which were predicted to be more toxic than VX. Of course, it could be that the AI has got it wrong (it happens!) and that none of these compounds are at all toxic. The details the team provides were published in the journal Nature Machine Intelligence.

It is rather worrying. But perhaps also inevitable and better that we know this is now a possibility rather than our ignoring the risks. It’s worth remembering, that the invention of dynamite had a notable dual use, noble and not so noble, you might say. This is in some way just a modern take of how an invention for good might so easily be manipulated for bad.

To quote from the paper: “We can take inspiration from examples such as The Hague Ethical Guidelines, which promote a culture of responsible conduct in the chemical sciences and guard against the misuse of chemistry, in order to have AI-focused drug discovery, pharmaceutical and possibly other companies agree to a code of conduct to train employees, secure their technology, and prevent access and potential misuse.”

That is unlikely to be enough in the long-term and it is perhaps inevitable that some rogue team somewhere is already building its own database of toxic agents using AI. We just have to hope that the worst in any such database are false positives or that they all prove to be too to tough to crack even for the best, bad chemists. But, given that we already have AI tools for devising chemical reaction schemes and have done for many years, it feels unlikely that this particular toxic genie is going to stay in its reaction flask for long.

ChatGPT updates and optimises the Sciencebase homepage

TL:DR – I prompted ChatGPT to redesign and recode the Sciencebase homepage.


You can get some interesting responses from everyone’s favourite language model, ChatGPT, if you give it a special prompt that tells it to act in a certain way. I have been testing this for months, but recently, I have also been toying with the idea of creating a minimalist homepage for the Sciencebase site and needed some HTML inspiration. I hand coded my first website in December 1995, so I thought it was about time something else did the heavy lifting for me…so…here’s the initial prompt I gave to the chat bot.

You are to act as a genius web designer. I would like a very simple, minimalist landing page to include a link to my main website from my root domain name and to describe briefly how I am an an award-winning and experienced science writer. I enjoy wildlife photography in my spare time and performing music with two different bands and a choir. You should provide me with the complete minimal html code.

Sample of html code generated by ChatGPT for the new sciencebase homepage

You can see how the new minimalist homepage this generated code produces looks right here.

I later asked ChatGPT to once again act as an expert in web design and html and to give me a rationale for designing a minimalist and fast-loading web landing page for the site. This is what it had to say:

  • Define the purpose and goal of the landing page: Before starting the design and development process, it’s important to understand the purpose and goal of the landing page. Is it to collect leads, sell a product, or simply provide information? This will help me determine what elements to include on the page and how to design the layout.
  • Choose a minimal colour scheme: Minimalist designs typically use a limited colour palette. I would choose a colour scheme that complements your brand and is easy on the eyes. It’s important to keep in mind that too many colours can distract users from the main message.
  • Simplify the navigation: Navigation should be straightforward and easy to understand. Users should be able to find what they’re looking for quickly and easily. I would minimize the number of links in the header and footer and prioritize the most important pages.
  • Optimize images: Images can slow down the loading time of the page, which can be frustrating for users. I would optimize images by compressing them and reducing their file size. This will help the page load faster without sacrificing quality.
  • Use clean HTML code: Clean HTML code can help improve the performance of the page and make it easier for search engines to crawl. I would use semantic HTML tags and minimize the use of unnecessary code. This will also make the page more accessible to users who rely on screen readers.
  • Prioritize content: The content on the landing page should be clear and concise. I would use headings, subheadings, and bullet points to break up text and make it more scannable. The most important information should be placed above the fold, so users don’t have to scroll to find it.
  • Optimize for mobile: More than half of web traffic comes from mobile devices, so it’s important to design the landing page with mobile users in mind. I would use responsive design techniques to ensure the page looks good on all screen sizes and load quickly on mobile devices.

Protecting your website with ChatGPT

TL:DR – I noticed someone attempt to use access a file called c99.php on one of my websites. It was blocked by the server, but I wanted to know more. ChatGPT explained that it was a hacking tool.


I was seeing some unusual activity in the logs for one of my websites, so I gave this prompt to ChatGPT, the language model, to see if it could offer an explanation:

You are to act as a web and programming expert with experience of PHP, WordPress, MySQL, and Apache. I noticed a visit to my site that was attempting to open a file called c99.php, is that file a hacking “backdoor” of some sort. It does not appear to exist on my server and if I try to open it, I get the following message in my web browser “This site can’t be reached, site unexpectedly closed the connection.”

Yes, c99.php is a commonly used backdoor file by hackers. It is usually uploaded to a vulnerable website to provide remote access and control to the hacker. The file name c99.php is derived from the popular web shell called “c99 shell”. This shell provides an easy-to-use interface for a hacker to access and manipulate files, databases, and other resources on the compromised server.

If you have noticed a request for c99.php on your website, it is likely that your website is being targeted by hackers. However, it’s good to note that this does not necessarily mean your site has already been compromised. It is possible that the hacker was simply scanning your site for vulnerabilities.

If the file does not exist on your server and you are unable to access it, it’s possible that your server’s security measures are preventing it from being uploaded or accessed. It is recommended that you take additional security measures to protect your website and server, such as regularly updating your software, using strong passwords, and implementing security plugins. It’s also a good idea to review your server logs to identify any suspicious activity and to report it to your hosting provider.

I then asked ChatGPT for advice on securing my site:

If you have identified any suspicious files on your server or if you suspect that your server has been compromised, it is important to take immediate action to secure your website and server. Here are some steps you can take to secure your server:

  1. Update your software: Make sure that your website software, including the CMS (e.g., WordPress), plugins, and themes, are up-to-date with the latest security patches. This will help to close any known vulnerabilities that could be exploited by hackers.
  2. Use strong passwords: Ensure that you and your users are using strong passwords that are not easy to guess. Use a mix of uppercase and lowercase letters, numbers, and symbols, and avoid using the same password across multiple accounts.
  3. Install security plugins: Install a security plugin such as Wordfence or Sucuri to monitor your website for suspicious activity, block malicious IPs, and detect and remove malware.
  4. Backup your data: Regularly backup your website files and databases so that you can restore your website quickly in case of a security breach or data loss.
  5. Limit user access: Only grant access to users who need it, and make sure that each user has the appropriate level of access. Use strong passwords, and consider implementing two-factor authentication for additional security.
  6. Use HTTPS: Enable HTTPS on your website to encrypt data transmitted between your website and users, preventing sensitive information from being intercepted by hackers.
  7. Contact your hosting provider: If you suspect that your server has been compromised, contact your hosting provider immediately. They may be able to help you identify and resolve the issue.

Given that all such security recommendations was already implemented on the WordPress side, I asked what might be done at teh server level via cPanel:

  1. Keep your cPanel account secure: Use strong passwords, and avoid using the same password across multiple accounts. Enable two-factor authentication if available. Also, make sure to log out of your cPanel account when you’re finished.
  2. Use an SSL certificate: Install an SSL certificate on your website to encrypt data transmitted between your website and users. This will help to prevent sensitive information from being intercepted by hackers.
  3. Monitor server logs: Check your server logs regularly to identify any suspicious activity. You can use tools such as AWStats or Webalizer to analyze your server logs and get insights into your website traffic.
  4. Enable ModSecurity: ModSecurity is a web application firewall that can help protect your website from common web-based attacks. It’s available in cPanel, and you can enable it under the “Security” section.
  5. Disable unused services: Disable any unused services in cPanel to reduce the attack surface of your server. For example, if you’re not using FTP, disable the FTP service.
  6. Install antivirus software: Install antivirus software on your server to scan for and remove any malware or viruses. There are several antivirus solutions available for cPanel, such as ClamAV.
  7. Backup your data: Regularly backup your website files and databases so that you can restore your website quickly in case of a security breach or data loss.

These are just a few suggestions for improving the security of your website and server. It’s important to note that some of these steps may require root access to the server, which may not be available on a shared hosting plan. However, your hosting provider may offer additional security features that you can take advantage of. It’s always a good idea to check with your hosting provider for specific recommendations on how to secure your server.

How to get ChatGPT to fix your website

TL:DR – Given an appropriate prompt, ChatGPT can write computer code to solve website problems…and more.


I’ve been doing web stuff since 1995, but sometimes running several sites as subdomains I come unstuck with redirects. Change something on one and it makes the same change inadvertently happen on another. It happened today, I wanted to change the way the RSS feeds work for the Sciencebase site, but the changes I made to the .htaccess file in the domain root kept b0rking another of my sites that’s on the same server as a sub-domain.

The problem was that I was getting scraped at the page level by various bots but individual pages on my site don’t have feeds as comments are disabled. There is one main RSS feed for all updates and separate ones for each category and each tag. I tried to fix it, but it was then redirecting the feed for one of my other sites to the main Sciencebase feed.

So I asked ChatGPT to help. I gave it this prompt to begin with:

You are an expert programmer with Apache knowledge, knowledge of redirects and the file .htaccess. Write a code to redirect all individual RSS feed pages generated by a website’s content management system (CMS) to the primary RSS for the site. I do not want you to redirect the RSS feeds assigned to individual category or tag pages.

It replied as follows:

Below the code snippet it added an explanation for each line, which is useful. That didn’t quite work how I was hoping it would, so I spelled out an example of what I wanted to happen:

The site is https://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog An example URL is https://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/an-artificial-album-cover.html I want to redirect any URLs of this type https://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/an-artificial-album-cover.html/feed But not any in a category or tag URL They should go to the primary RSS URL for https://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/

It then gave me a revised version of the code, which worked fine, although needed an additional tweak to block the interfering with the other website problem. It took about ten minutes all in. I could’ve spent an hour or more on a search engine trying to home in a page discussing the exact same scenario. I think it’s all working cleanly now.

Updates and an artificial album cover

TL:DR – Updating Sciencebase systems and using MidJourney to generate some intriguing artwork to illustrate a blog post.


As regular readers will know, I’ve been running the Sciencebase site since July 1999. Its precursor, Elemental Discoveries, had various homes on the web from December 1995 until that fateful summer. There are almost 4000 articles in the archives, so it’s quite a hefty site for a one-man show.

AI image of a boy staring at a television, the image is reminiscent of a 1980s Rush album cover, specifically Power Windows

Anyway, having played around with various website options in the last couple of weeks, I’ve finally done a proper spring clean, got rid of some very out-of-date articles and updated others that were worth keeping. I’ve upgraded security and performance stuff so the site should load much faster than ever before but also present no security problems to visitors (I don’t think it ever did, to be honest).

I’ve also now added a new and improved search box. I’ve also made search easier for mobile users who can now access the search box from the menu rather than guessing where it might be and having to scroll to the bottom of the page. The new search box also anticipates what it is you might be searching for. So, if you start typing “avian” it might assume you’re after information on “avian influenza” of which there is quite a lot in the Sciencebase archives.

All in, I hope the site is now offering an improved experience for the 3000 or so unique visitors the site gets every day!

I also wanted an illustration for this blog post about all the updates and so prompted MidJourney with the spider web emoji to allude to the world wide web and websites. It came back with four images, as it does. Two were odd superhero, Spider Man type images, one was rather eclectic and showed a girl staring through the window of a house at raging fire in the middle of the room.

The other seemed much more apt. It purportedly showed a young boy in a red hoodie with his back to us presumably staring at a large, old-fashioned television screen. A child dreaming of a future, perhaps? It also struck me as being rather of the style of artist Hugh Syme who worked on album covers for the Canadian rock band Rush for decades.

Indeed, this generated boy watching TV image might almost have been an outtake from the designs for the band’s Power Windows album which also features a boy and television screens. I might use it for some of my music output at some point, but have annotated it for now with my name and the word SCIENCEBASE.

A ChatGPT glossary

TL:DR – A number of people were reaching Sciencebase searching for the phrase ChatGPT beam search so I asked ChatGPT itself to give me a definition. I then asked it to create a glossary of other common terms associated with Generative pre-trained transformers, GPTs.


ChatGPT, the language model, is essentially an incredibly sophisticated autocomplete program that responds to text prompts by predicting what might come next. It’s worth noting that it’s commonly referred to as artificial intelligence, AI. It is not AI. Here’s its response to my prompt asking it for a definition of ChatGPT beam search:

Beam search is a search algorithm used in Natural Language Processing (NLP) to find the most likely sequence of words or phrases that represent the best possible solution, given a set of choices.

In simpler terms, when trying to predict the next word or sequence of words in a sentence, there are often multiple possibilities that could be correct. The beam search algorithm helps to narrow down the number of options and find the most likely option based on the context and probability of each word or phrase.

The “beam” in beam search refers to the number of possible options that the algorithm keeps in consideration at each step of the search. By limiting the number of options to a certain “beam width”, the algorithm can efficiently explore the search space and find the best solution more quickly than exhaustively considering all possible options.


I then asked it to generate a glossary of the most important terms in discussions of ChatGPT:

Generative pre-trained transformer, GPT: GPT is a type of language model developed by OpenAI that uses deep learning techniques to generate natural language text. The GPT model is based on a transformer architecture, which was introduced in a paper by Vaswani et al. in 2017, pre-training involves exposing the system to a large amount of written text so that it “learns” the meaning and context of different words and phrases.

Natural Language Processing (NLP): A field of study that focuses on teaching computers to understand, analyze, and generate human language.

Neural Networks: A type of machine learning model that is inspired by the structure and function of the human brain.

Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN): A type of neural network that is specifically designed to handle sequential data, such as text.

Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM): A type of RNN that is designed to better handle long-term dependencies in sequential data.

Attention Mechanism: A technique used in NLP that allows models to focus on specific parts of the input sequence when making predictions.

Transformer: A type of neural network architecture that uses self-attention mechanisms to process input sequences in parallel.

BERT: Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers. A transformer-based neural network architecture that is designed to better understand the context and meaning of words in a sentence by processing them in both directions.

GPT-3: Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3. A large-scale language model developed by OpenAI that uses a transformer architecture and is capable of generating human-like text.

GPT-4: The latest version of the language model from OpenAI as of March 2023. This version can handle around 25000 words at a time, that’s about eight times as many as GPT-3 can cope with.

Pretraining: The process of training a model on a large amount of data to learn general features of a language or domain.

Domain: A specific topic or subject area on which a text or dataset is focused.

Fine-tuning: The process of adapting a pre-trained model to a specific task or domain by training it on a smaller, task-specific dataset.

Fine-tuning strategies: Various techniques used to fine-tune pre-trained language models, like GPT, for specific NLP tasks. Examples include task-specific architectures, adding domain-specific data, and adjusting learning rates.

Language Modelling: The task of predicting the probability of the next word in a sentence or sequence of words.

Text Generation: The task of generating new text that is similar in style and structure to a given input text.

Transformer-based language models: A type of language model, like GPT, that uses the transformer architecture to process input sequences.

Generative models: Machine learning models, like GPT, that can generate new output based on input data.

Sampling: The process of randomly selecting words or phrases from a language model, like GPT, to generate new text.

Top-p sampling: A type of sampling that selects from the most probable words or phrases in a language model, like GPT, until a certain probability threshold is reached.

Top-k sampling: A type of sampling that selects from the top k most probable words or phrases in a language model, like GPT.

Perplexity: A metric used to evaluate the performance of a language model, like GPT, by measuring how well it predicts new text.

Overfitting: A situation where a model, like GPT, performs well on training data but poorly on new data due to being too closely fitted to the training data.

Transfer learning: A technique in machine learning where a pre-trained model is used as a starting point for a new task or dataset, in order to improve the performance and efficiency of training.

Language transfer learning: A type of machine learning that involves training models, like GPT, on one language or domain and transferring that knowledge to a different language or domain.

Unsupervised learning: A type of machine learning that involves training models, like GPT, on unlabeled data, without the need for explicit supervision or labeling of input data.

Input sequence: The text or sequence of words that is fed into a language model, like GPT, to generate output.

Embeddings: A vector representation of words or phrases used by language models, like GPT, to process input and generate output.

End-to-end training: A type of training where a model, like GPT, is trained to perform a specific task from start to finish without any intermediate steps or processing.

Dialogue generation: The production of responses to a given dialogue context. This is an important application of language models like GPT, and it involves training models to generate coherent and relevant responses to a user’s input in a conversation.

Multi-modal learning: A type of machine learning that involves processing and integrating information from multiple modalities, such as text, images, and audio.

Inference: The process of using a trained model, like GPT, to generate output based on input data.

Domain adaptation: A type of transfer learning that involves adapting a pre-trained model, like GPT, to a specific domain or task by fine-tuning it on a smaller, task-specific dataset.

Hyperparameters: Parameters in a machine learning model, like GPT, that are set by the user and affect the model’s behavior, such as the learning rate or batch size. These are typically tuned through experimentation to optimize model performance.

Knowledge graph: A type of graph database that stores information in a structured format, representing relationships between entities and their attributes. This is often used to extract and store structured data from unstructured text, and can be used as a knowledge base to inform language models like GPT.

Text classification: The task of categorizing text into one or more predefined classes or categories. This is an important application of NLP, and can be used to classify documents, emails, social media posts, and other types of text data.

Named entity recognition (NER): The task of identifying and extracting named entities such as people, organizations, locations, and dates from unstructured text. This is an important application of NLP, and is used in tasks such as information extraction and text classification.

Conditional generation: The task of generating text, like in GPT, that satisfies a certain condition or requirement, such as generating a story based on a given prompt or question.

GPT-2: A larger and more powerful version of the original GPT model, with 1.5 billion parameters.

GPT-3: A state-of-the-art language model developed by OpenAI with 175 billion parameters, capable of generating highly coherent and contextually appropriate text.

Megatron: A high-performance GPT model developed by NVIDIA, designed to train on large-scale distributed systems.

T5: A transformer-based language model developed by Google, capable of performing a wide range of natural language processing tasks.

CTRL: A conditional transformer language model developed by Salesforce, designed for generating coherent and controllable text.

BingGPT: BingGPT is a proprietary language model developed by Microsoft from the starting point of the GPT architecture developed by OpenAI, which has been incorporated into Microsoft’s search engine.

OpenAI: An “artificial intelligence” research laboratory consisting of a team of scientists and engineers focused on developing cutting-edge AI technologies. The organization was founded in 2015