When the Bittern booms

The call of a cryptic Bittern hidden in a reedbed is one of the most evocative sounds of nature at this time of year. The sound is known as booming, but it’s more like the sound of someone blowing across the top of an empty drinks bottle. Earlier in the season, the frisky males started warming up with some guttural grunts, progressing to the full bottle when they sense the females might be receptive.

Bittern in flight
Eurasian, or Great, Bittern, Botaurus stellaris

If you were out and about in the fens not twenty years ago, chances of hearing a booming Bittern were very low as the bird was all-but extinct in England. Habitat creation and other conservation efforts have led to a resurgence. So, most walks we take at this time of year among our fenland reserves, many of which are essentially repurposed and planted gravel pits, will reward us with a few booms and an occasional flypast.

Bittern in flight

I was walking at RSPB Berry Fen this morning. I’d picked up a whole lot of different warblers – Chiff Chaff, Reed Warbler, Whitethroat, Lesser Whitethroat, Blackcap, and Garden Warbler [What’s a warbler, anyway? Ed.] and a few Great White Egret, Little Egret, and Grey Heron as well as the usual ducks, crows, gulls, and cormorants. I was at the most northerly part of the fen close to one of those repurposed gravel pits known as Barleycroft Lake (part of RSPB Ouse Fen) and just about to head into the lake area when a male Bittern, appeared, flying low from the lake area. You can tell it’s a male from the pale blue marking on the lores. In ornithology, the lore is the patch between eye and bill on the side of a bird’s head. It’s usually featherless and sometimes coloured, as is the case with male Bitterns.

Bittern in flight

There are reeds on the edge of that lake, so presumably that’s this male’s usual patch, but it flew out over the dry edge of Berry Fen, sortied a rather brief reconnaissance flight, turned tail, presumably when it realised there was no reedy cover when it saw me and quickly, flew back into the lake area. Luckily, I had a few seconds of its U-turn to grab a few snapshots as it flew past silently. No sonic boom.

Bittern in flight

The bittern, Botaurus stellaris, is grouped with the herons, storks, and ibises, but obviously most closely resembles a heron than a stork or ibis.

Zen and the Art of Photography

Much of the pleasure in photography is seeking out the subject, appreciating the light, dialling in the settings and pressing the shutter.

For some, not so much of the pleasure is the scrolling through dozens of burst-mode images of the same thing trying to decide which one is sharpest and captures the essence of the subject best and deleting the others. Sometimes I’m happy doing that, but to be honest, the capturing process is the real fun, unless a truly unique image emerges from the roll. I’ve written about a couple of philosophical aspects of photography previously. One article was entitled Patience – an internal app to help you take better wildlife photos, which was about being mindful and taking time to get the shot you want. A second item was about stifling the urge to seek out validation for one’s photographic output on social media. That article was entitled In time, we discover ourselves.

In that latter article, I mention a friend called Andy, a professional-grade, but fiscally amateur photographer (just like me, hahahah). We often discuss the trials and tribulations of photographing nature. Of the lack of decent light, of too much sun and shadow, of not finding the subjects to snap, and of poorly performing camera settings that don’t give us the perfect shot that we hoped for. And tha endless roll scrolling and deleting.

It occurred to me, having had one of our conversations, that the best way forward would be to simply take the card out of the camera, set the camera to allow photos to be taken without the card in place, and to enjoy the moment, the thrill of the chase, the silent click of the shutter. We could simply forget about the afterburn of sorting and editing. As there would be nothing to sort nor delete. It would also save us a fortune in memory cards and cloud storage.

Indeed, one might go a step further and leave the camera at home too. Just spend time seeking out subjects or even simply appreciating those photogenic places we visit without the need to do the photo gen. Zen and the art of imaginary photography…

…of course, without all those rolls to scroll, there’d be little to do trapped indoors on a rainy day with a stinking head cold.

Local Peregrine Falcons – Falco peregrinus

Today, we got to a local site about 20 minutes after the pair of Peregrine Falcons that live there had gone off hunting…at least according to one birder who was leaving as we arrived. We trekked on and awaited the raptors’ return and in the meantime watched several Red Kite, some Common Buzzard, and a couple of nesting Kestrels.

Peregrine Falcon in flight
Peregrine Falcon in flight

The Peregrines turned up about an hour later, preyless. They darted back to their nest site in the chalk cliff. Travelling fast, but not quite at their stooping speed which can be up to 200mph. One of the pair then zoomed off again to look for lunch, leaving the other to stare at us quizzically.

Peregrine on a chalk cliff, angling its head upwards, I suspect it was getting a clearer view o me, rather than looking at anything in the sky
Peregrine on a chalk cliff, angling its head upwards, I suspect it was getting a clearer view o me, rather than looking at anything in the sky
Peregrines often look at you from odd angles…this is perhaps because they have two sharp central focus points in each eye (the fovea centralis), rather than the one we have for each eye. In the Peregrine, one is for long-distance sharp vision that allows it to pinpoint prey from at least a couple of miles away. The second focus point is for shorter distance vision to help it see its prey clearly as it approaches during the stoop.

Peregrine basically means from abroad/foreign. In Latin per is away and egrine from agri meaning field, so “away field” = abroad. Perhaps it is suggestive of the bird somehow being a wanderer, the etymology is unclear.

Peregrine on its nest site
Peregrine on its nest site staring directly at the photographic intruder some distance away (big zoom lens)

Falcon comes from Latin falcis, meaning curved blade/war sickle, and may allude to the curved beak, the talons, or the wing profile…again, the etymology is somewhat lost in the history of falconry.

ISO redux

There was almost no photographic light left in the sky after sunet last night, but a Barn Owl flew past and I really just had to grab a shot even though I was just about to head home. My Canon R7 set to auto-ISO jumped to 20000, which is very high so the photo was very noisy/grainy. I usually denoise my images with DxO PureRaw 4 and for this one it had to be done. PureRaw drops the ISO by about three stops, so that’s as if the camera had been shooting at ISO 2500.

Low-light Barn Owl in flight
Barn Owl, image denoised with DxO PureRaw 4 and then gently edited in PaintShopPro

For those interested in such things, ISO ain’t what it used to be as I mentioned before. For film cameras, ISO was a measure of the sensitivity of the film. You used to use a higher ISO if you were shooting in lower light conditions.

For a digital camera, there’s no way to change the sensitivity of the sensor. So, adjusting the ISO does nothing more than turn up the brightness of the image you’ve captured and this brightness control is then embedded into the photo you download from the camera.

At lower light levels, your camera needs to turn up the brightness for the same shutter speed and aperture (f-stop) to get the exposure level you want. This means the noise is turned up brighter too, commonly seen as a purple speckles throughout the darker areas of the photo, but also impinging to different degrees across the whole image.

Now, the noise in a film photo is often referred to as grain (because it’s associated with the grain size of the particles of light-sensitive silver compounds in the film itself) It’s often seen as moody, romantic, and evocative, especially in noir Hollywood photos or the celebrity portrait work of David Bailey etc et cetera. It can be pleasing, just like the crackles and pops of classic vinyl…ish.

But, for digital photos, noise is just noise. It’s not grain, it’s not really romantic, nor evocative, it detracts and distorts the detail in your photo. So anything you can do to keep the ISO as low as possible and any processing that removes the noise without removing detail is, to my eye, a good thing. There are limits, but as regular viewers will know I almost always use DxO PureRaw to do the basic pre-edit processing of my photos. It essentially turns down the digital ISO control by three “stops” but without lowering the brightness.

The Barn Owl was shot at ISO 20000, so DxO is effectively bringing that down to ISO 2500, which is still way too high for a clean photo. But, it beats the RAW image straight out of the camera.

Incidentally, all this pre-processing and processing, is basically the digital equivalent of developing the film and printing from the negative as you would do with film. Some people imagine it’s somehow cheating because there are a lot more options allowing you to adjust levels and other stuff when you process digital negatives (the camera RAW) file, but it’s worth looking at the history of film photography to see how that nothing has changed fundamentally. Photography is not reality, it has always been about capturing a moment in time and developing it in such a way as to make that moment special after the event.

Barn Owl in flight pre-PSP
This is the Barn Owl as it looked after processing the RAW file with DxO but prior to adjust levels with PSP
Barn Owl
This is the Barn Owl as it looked before processing the RAW file with DxO
Barn Owl before and after DxO and PSP processing
Barn Owl before and after DxO and PSP processing

ISO is not ISO when it comes to digital photography

When you first learn about photography, you’re taught about the exposure triangle – shutter speed, aperture, and the ISO sensitivity of the film. Back in the day, you’d choose your film sensitivity to suit the light levels under which you’d expect to shoot. You then play aperture against shutter speed to balance the exposure of the image. You might then opt for smaller apertures (bigger f number) for longer depth of field means you need a longer shutter speed. Choosing a short shutter speed to freeze action would conversely mean you needed a bigger aperture to capture sufficient light.

In digital photography, the concept of ISO has changed. With a digital camera, you can have a different ISO for every frame you shoot if you like and so you have more options about balancing aperture and shutter speed for artistic purposes. However, it is important to note that while a different ISO value really meant a different light sensitivity of the film, you cannot change the sensitivity of a digital camera’s sensor. So, changing ISO is not changing anything physically as it would be with film.

Rather, changing ISO in a digital camera affects how the signal from the sensor is processed by the camera’s software. When you increase the ISO in a digital camera, the sensor’s raw signal is amplified. This means the image becomes brighter. The change in ISO is more akin to turning up the volume control on your stereo or headphones. And, as with a stereo turned up too loud you get distortion. For a digital image that distortion is, ironically, known as noise (random specks of colour in the image). Noise is more noticeable at higher ISO settings and in the darker areas of an image, which is why many photographers try to keep their ISO as low as possible.

The high-ISO noise effect is worse the smaller the sensor, so full-frame digital cameras tend not to be as “noisy” as cropped sensors and cameras with even smaller sensors, such as superzooms.

Of course, there are tools such as DxO’s PureRaw, Lightroom, Topaz Denoise, etc that allow you to remove the noise to some degree without distorting the image. Some work better than others, for me, PureRaw 4 seems to give me the best results.

 

Striving for something more than the half-decent record shot

Photography, as with any other visual art form, hinges on a blend of technical skill and creative vision. While perfection can be elusive and subjective, achieving a “half-decent” photo that captures attention and tells a story is almost always an attainable goal whatever your skill level and with whatever equipment you have. Remember, if you want a photo, any camera is better than no camera (we’ve all been there and done that!). Meanwhile, here are a few thoughts on how to lift the passable snapshot to the inspiring image.

You can take a look at some of my photographic work and decide whether I live up to my own standards here.

Understanding light – Light is the fundamental of photography. Whether you’re working with natural or artificial light, how you harness it can define your photo. For instance, the magical Golden Hour: Early morning just before sunrise and late afternoon just before sunset offer soft, warm light that flatters most subjects. Shadows are gentle, and the light’s directionality adds depth.

Contrast that with the serenity of Blue Hour: The moments before sunrise and those after sunset provide cool, moody tones ideal for atmospheric shots. It’s also worth adding that darkness and shadows are not the enemy of the photographer, indeed they help you create drama, texture, and contrast. Timing the shadows in a landscape or even a portrait lets you leap from flat to dynamic.

Correct exposure – A well-exposed photograph is the foundation of visual appeal. Proper exposure ensures that details in both highlights and shadows are visible without appearing bleached out or overly dark. While modern editing tools allow some latitude for correcting exposure, it’s always best to get it right in-camera. Understanding your camera’s metering modes and how they interact with the scene’s light levels is the key. Also, shoot in RAW every time if that’s an option it then gives you the chance to retrieve detail from seemingly over-exposed or under-exposed areas in your photo and balance once against the other.

Sharp focus – A blurry subject can ruin an otherwise excellent composition. Ensuring your subject is in sharp focus is non-negotiable, unless the blur is the artistic choice. Autofocus systems have become highly advanced, but their capabilities must be matched with a keen eye for detail. For portraits, focus on the eyes. For landscapes, ensure the desired depth of field is achieved. The sharpness guides the viewer’s attention to what you want them to see. Of course, depth-of-field is like any commodity. You may want a short depth of field for a portrait so that the background is blurred, but for a macro shot you may want the whole frame to be sharp. This comes at the cost of how much light reaches your sensor or film. Smaller aperture means less light getting in, but a bigger depth of field.

De-noising grainy images – Noise, especially in low-light conditions or at high ISO settings, can detract from a photo’s quality. While some genres, such as street photography or film emulation, embrace a certain level of grain for artistic purposes, overly noisy images in genres like wildlife or portraiture can feel distracting. Post-processing can sometimes help you clawback the clarity, working best with RAW files.

Artistic cropping – Cropping is a powerful tool that allows photographers to refine their composition post-capture. A thoughtful crop can eliminate distractions, emphasize the subject, and create visual harmony. Whether filling the frame with an intimate close-up or leaving negative space or background for context, the crop should complement the story you’re telling. Remember the rule of thirds but don’t be afraid to break it if the composition feels stronger with different angles and different space.

Animal photography: The leading eye – When photographing animals, the leading eye must be pin-sharp. This draws the viewer’s attention and conveys emotion and personality. The leading eye acts as a visual anchor, guiding the viewer through the frame. Shots where the animal is looking away don’t often work, unless the context justifies it. For example, a distant gaze that matches a dramatic landscape or tells a broader story about the animal’s environment.

Catchlights: Breathing life into eyes – Catchlights, the reflections of light in a subject’s eyes, add depth and vitality, particularly in animal or human portraits. Without catchlights, eyes can appear flat and lifeless. Photographers often use natural light or controlled artificial light to introduce this subtle yet critical element. Catchlights don’t just reveal the light source; they transform the image by infusing character and emotion.

Photography, like any art, is about emotion. You need patience to get that perfect light, expression, or moment, but that patience can be rewarded with the shot you’re really after rather than the record shot you’d quickly snap just to make do.

Learn the rules so you can use them to best effect when they’re needed, but also so you can break those same rules when it means a better photo. You can ditch the rule of thirds, the golden ratio, you can try unusual angles or play with unconventional perspectives. Focus on that unusual aspect of the subject, not the obvious. Observe and try to see things from a different angle to help you tell a unique story with your photos.

My older photos online

Before my current penchant for avian and Lepidoptera photography, I took a lot of photos of bands at festivals, masses of landscape shots, and a stack of architecture. If you fancy digging deep into roughly a quarter of a century of photography, check out my 500px, GuruShots, and Flickr galleries. I used sciencebase as its own link shortener to get you there quickly:

GuruShots

500px

Flickr

Paxton Pits Nature Reserve

It’s quite some time since we last visited Paxton Pits Nature Reserve in Cambridgeshire, well before the covid pandemic, March 2019, in fact, if my photo archive dates are to be believed and before that January 2018. Tempus fugit, as they say. And, speaking of things that fly and sound a bit Latin, there were plenty of Regulus regulus among the fir trees not far from the site’s visitor centre.

Goldcrest at Paxton Pits Nature Reserve
Grumpy Goldcrest at Paxton Pits Nature Reserve

The nature reserve is, like so many of our local sites gravel pits that have been turned over in whole or in part to nature. It saves the aggregate companies having to back-fill once they have excavated all the millions of tons of sand and gravel they need and gives nature a chance to thrive in areas that would otherwise be turned back into unused flatland. The Paxton reserve was, until World War II, largely farmland on the edge of the village of Little Paxton. The gravel excavations were started during the war. There is still activity, but a large area is now lakes for wildlife, trails, and some lakes for fishing and boating activities.

Goldcrest taking flight at Paxton Pits Nature Reserve
Goldcrest taking flight

Not far from the visitor centre was the site of the former farmhouse. The historical sign there tells visitors about the farmhouse that once stood on this spot and about the provenance of the row of quite tall fir trees that stand in front of where the farmhouse once was. Apparently, they were Christmas trees! They have now grown so tall that you’d need the longest of long ladders to put the fairy on the top and hang your baubles.

Anyway, it was among these fir trees that numerous R. regulus were darting about. Readers that are regulus as clockwork will know that this species is the UK’s joint smallest bird, the Goldcrest, as I’ve mentioned it before. Its equally diminutive partner is the slightly less common but equally tiny Firecrest.

A fellow photographer, who turned out to be on the reserve’s bird-ringing team, pointed out that the Goldcrests we were photographing were probably winter visitors from Scandinavia enjoying the slightly warmer climate of East Anglia and the rich pickings to be had on a sunny January day among the fir trees. She wasn’t entirely certain, but seemed to imply that there aren’t usually any in this location during the summer months although she had witnessed nesting in one of the Xmas trees previously.

Goldcrest are so small, so fast moving, and often spend their time in the depths of the needles of fir trees, that it is commonly rather difficult to get a good snap in sunlight. If you’re hearing isn’t shot, you can usually pick up their very high-pitched hissy tweets. However, the Scandinavians were rather obliging today and at least I got a couple of nice shots of these delightful creatures with their golden crests.

A Kestrel for a Knave

A Kestrel for a Knave was a book by Barry Hines published in 1968. It was adapted for the Ken Loach film Kes.

Kestrel perched on a solitary, vertical branch

The protagonist, Billy Casper, was played by actor David Bradley who later had to adopt the stage name Dai Bradley, because there was already an EQUITY member, the RSC actor David Bradley. You may know the latter from many a TV drama, as unintelligible Arthur Webley in Hot Fuzz, as Filch in the Harry Potter films, as the first Doctor in Doctor Who and as William Hartnell in An Adventure in Space and Time, and Walder Frey from Game of Thrones, etc…I met him once, I mentioned it before.

As for Dai Bradley, he was also in the film Zulu Dawn, a couple of other films and various TV parts.

When the book was reprinted after Kes the film, they used the infamous scene of Billy sticking two fingers up for the cover…I grew up with this book…I was infamous by proxy as a child.

SWT Lackford Lakes

First trip of the year to the Suffolk Wildlife Trust nature reserve known as Lackford Lakes. 2nd January 2025, glorious sunny day, first such of the year and the first for quite some time.

Nuthatch, Sitta europaea on *the* log at Lackford Lakes
Nuthatch, Sitta europaea on *the* log at Lackford Lakes
One of several Marsh Tit picking at titbits on the Lackford Log
One of several Marsh Tit, Poecile palustris, that were picking at titbits on the Lackford Log, bird seeds and bird fat placed deliberately by birders and toggers.
Blue Tit on thorny branch
Blue Tit on thorny branch
Great Tit, Parus major
Great Tit, Parus major. Should be known as the Black-masked Gold Tit, I reckon

Having seen four raptors on the journey there – Buzzard, Kestrel, Sparrowhawk, Red Kite – a trek through the reserve to see what we could see then gave us:

      1. Blackbird
      2. Black-headed Gull
      3. Blue Tit
      4. Buzzard
      5. Canada Goose
      6. Chaffinch
      7. Cormorant
      8. Coal Tit
      9. Coot
      10. Dunnock
      11. Egyptian Goose
      12. Gadwall
      13. Great Tit
      14. Great White Egret
      15. Greenfinch
      16. Greylag Goose
      17. Grey Heron
      18. Kestrel
      19. Lapwing
      20. Little Egret
      21. Long-tailed Tit
      22. Mallard
      23. Marsh Tit
      24. Moorhen
      25. Mute Swan
      26. Nuthatch
      27. Pheasant
      28. Pochard
      29. Red Kite
      30. Robin
      31. Siskin
      32. Snipe
      33. Song Thrush
      34. Sparrowhawk
      35. Teal
      36. Treecreeper
      37. Tufted Duck
      38. Wigeon
      39. Wood Pigeon

There was also a very odd looking bird being harried by a Blackbird in a tree. It was probably a juvenile Blackbird, but it seemed to have a rufous bib and a very pale, speckled breast for a brief second I imagined it might be an Asian vagrant in the form of a Red-throated Thrush. But, very, very doubtful.

2nd January 2025 was also our first outdoor picnic of the year! Is an indoor picnic an oxymoron?